Đzleme ve Denetim Ziyaretleri. 6 Mart 2008 Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Trabzon

Transkript

1 Đzleme ve Denetim Ziyaretleri 6 Mart 2008 Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Trabzon

2 Neden Denetim? Ulusal Ajanslar Avrupa Komisyonu ile imzalanan sözleșme uyarınca ve program kuralları gereğince üniversiteleri denetler Bu bir taahhüttür ve sözleșmenin bir gereğidir! Denetim ve Đzleme de nelere bakılacağını Komisyon belirlemektedir! Bu denetim ve Đzleme sonuçları Komisyon a Rapor edilir! Gerekirse Komisyon bașka kurumlara denetletebileceği gibi kendisi de doğrudan denetler

3 Erasmus Ofisleri Rektörlük binasında Ya çok konforlu ve geniș Ya çok dar ve sıkıșık Pros & Cons Onay merciine yakın Prestijli Merkezi ișlere uygun Öğrenciye uzak Giriș çıkıșlar için caydırıcı

4 AltyapI Bina ve Teçhizat açısından genelde uygun ve donanımlı Ancak mekan olarak çoğunlukla yetersiz Öğrencilerle görüșme ve ofis ișleri aynı ortamda yapılıyor Đstisnaları var

5 Dosyalama Merkezi dosyalama olmayan örnekler var Bașvuru dosyalarına ulașılamıyor Kimler müracaat etti, seçilemeyenler neden seçilemedi belli değil Seçim Komisyonu görevlendirmeleri veya tutanakları yok Seçim Komisyonu mülakat sınav sonuçları ile ilan sonuçları aynı değil notlar bir yolla değișmiș Seçim sonuçlarında kaybeden öğencilerle ilgili hiç bir bilgi mevcut değil kaç puan aldı, bu öğrenciler kimler, vs. Sanki tüm müracaat eden öğrenciler seçilmiș gibi!

6 Dosyalama devam... Her öğrenciye ait bir dosyada olması gereken belgeler konusunda ciddi eksiklikler var Daha önceden önerdiğimiz check-list mevcut değil Banka dekontları yok Banka dökümünde ayrıntılı isimler yok miktar çıkmıș, ama kim adına, hangi hesaba çıkmıș belli değil

7 TanItIm Basılı tanıtım malzemeleri neredeyse hiç yok Web sayfası güncel değil hâlâ Socrates dönemi verileri mevcut Düzenli bilgilendirme yapılmıyor Bilgilendirme var, ancak Merkez ofis bunlardan haberdar değil Bilgilendirme için basılan duyurularda hatalı bilgiler mevcut Bilgilendirme için kullanılan çoğunluklaweb sayfasında süreç çok açık gösterilmemiș

8 Seçim sürecis Bașvurular kayıt altında değil Eligibility kontrolu yok tüm müracatlar alınmamıș Seçim Komisyonu na ait çıkar çatıșması deklarasyonu yok Yabancı dil kriteri bu sınavı ofisin yapması uygun değil! Yabancı Diller Merkezleri yapmalı șeffaflık, hakkaniyet ve profesyonellik için! Bașvuru ilanında yanlıș yönlendirmeler var eligibility gibi...

9 Uygulamanın n Değerlendirilmesi erlendirilmesi Öğrenci takip sistemi yok Saldım çayıra Mevlam kayıra mı??? AKTS ne kadar doğru kullanılıyor? Oryantasyon: büyük eksiklik!!! Hem gelenler hem de gidenler için! Dönen öğrencilerin ve öğretim elemanlarının tecrübelerinin değerlendirilmesi genelde yapılmamıș Dönenler için yeniden oryantasyon??? Kalacak yer ayarlanması!!! Gelen öğrencilerden șikayetler var!

10 Formlar ve Belgeler Öğrenim Anlașması!!! LLP döneminde büyük eksiklik var! Erasmus Öğrenci Beyannamesi öğrencilerin bir kesimi almadıklarını söylüyorlar Tanınırlık Belgesi henüz resmi olarak bir belgeye dönüștürülememiș! Transkript Diploma Eki talep edene veriliyor! Illusion! Katılım Sertifikası Genelde problem yok! Raporlar Genelde var!

11 Ödemeler Bir kișinin adına ödeme talimatı verilmesi gerçekte o kișinin hesabına bu hibenin gittiği anlamına gelmiyor! Hesapların Strateji Geliștirme Dairesi Bașkanlığına devredilmesi Muhasebeleștirmenin profesyonelce yapılması zorunluluğu Ödemeyi talep edenle ödeme emrini veren makamların ayrı olması - kontrol Maliye Bakanlığı talimatı

12 Erasmus Üniversite Beyannamesi Yanlıș bilgiler mevcut Yönetim, EPS da belirtilen ve verilen sözlerden haberdar değil! Yabancı Dil Hazırlığı! En kritik husus tanınma! Farklı yorumlar mevcut!

13 The Promise What? A learner can achieve the learning outcomes (LO) designed for a learning activity LO= Statements of what a learner is expected to know, understand, and / or be able to do at the end of a period of learning How? by investing time and effort his workload WL) WL= A quantitative measure of all learning activities that may be feasibly required for the achievement of the learning outcomes 13

14 The Promise The workload is expressed as a quantitative figure = credit The achievement is expressed as a qualitative result = learning outcomes This is documented = Learning Agreement gehmlich@wi.fh-osnabrueck.de 14

15 Learning Agreement (LA) By registering for a learning programme The student agrees that he has to sit for examinations etc. to be eligible for the desired degree, certificate The institution agrees to make available the teaching and learning facilities to ensure that the learning outcomes can be achieved in the stipulated time and to award a degree, certificate as as soon as the learner has fulfilled the learning requirements gehmlich@wi.fh-osnabrueck.de 15

16 Transcript of Records (TOR) The TOR confirms what the learner has achieved on the basis of the learning agreement by stipulating the credits linked to the modules etc. TOR also specifies how the learner has achieved the learning outcomes. This is documented by the local grade and an ECTS rating 16

17 2 Qualification 1 Holder of the Qualification 3 Level 8 National Educational system THE Diploma Supplement 4 Contents and achieved results 7 Certification 5 Function of the qualification 6 Complementary information The Diploma Supplement gehmlich@wi.fh-osnabrueck.de 17

18 EUC The Institution agrees to comply with the following fundamental principles of Erasmus mobility: Mobility shall be carried out only within prior interinstitutional agreements; No university fees for tuition, registration, examinations, access to laboratory and library facilities are to be charged to in-coming Erasmus students; Full recognition must be given to students for satisfactorily completed activities specified in the compulsory Learning Agreement

19 The institution also agrees: to ensure the highest quality in the organisation of student and staff mobility To ensure that curriculum information is up to date, easily accessible and transparent and that an academic credit transfer system (ECTS or similar) gives transparency to the procedures To ensure equal academic treatment and services to home and Erasmus students To support the integration of visiting Erasmus students in the Institution s activities To provide incoming Erasmus students and their home institutions with transcripts containing full, and accurate and timely information at the end of their mobility period abroad; to facilitate and acknowledge Erasmus teaching activities; to promote and give visibility to the activities supported by the Erasmus programme; to publicize this Charter and the related Erasmus Policy Statement of the Institution; to comply with the objectives on non-discrimination set out in the Lifelong Learning Programme.

20 .../. This Charter entitles the Institution to apply to its National Agency and to the European Commission for grant support for Erasmus activities. Violation of this Charter may lead to its withdrawal by the European Commission

21 Key obligations for Erasmus universities Inter-institutional agreements have been signed with all partner institutions for mobility purposes; No university fees for tuition, registration, examinations, access to laboratory and library facilities are to be charged to in-coming Erasmus students; Full recognition is given to students for satisfactorily completed activities during their mobility period; Highest quality is ensured for the organisation of student and staff mobility (and the organisation of student placements, where the institution is engaged in this activity); Up to date, easily accessible and transparent information on curricula is available; An effective academic credit transfer system is in operation; Equal academic treatment and services are ensured for home and Erasmus students; The integration of visiting Erasmus students in the activities of the institution is supported; Incoming Erasmus students and their home institutions are provided with transcripts and information in a timely manner; Erasmus teaching activities are facilitated and acknowledged; The institution s Erasmus activities are promoted and given the necessary high visibility; The Erasmus Charter and the Erasmus Policy Statement are publicised in the institution and are easily accessible to the students; The Institution complies with the non-discrimination objectives set out in the Life-long Learning programme.

22 Points for checking In the current EUC there are two categories of points falling under two headers: a) the institution has agreed to the provision set out ; b) the institution has agreed to make every effort to ensure high quality in

23 As a general rule, the points in the first category will be taken n into account for the purpose of possible cancellation of the Charter. The four essential points are: Mobility can be carried out only under prior bilateral or multilateral agreements between institutions; No university fees are to be charged to incoming Erasmus students; Full academic recognition must be given to students for courses specified in the Learning Agreements, which students have taken and passed; To comply with the regulations on mobility set out in the contract between the institution and the NA.

24 Moreover, during monitoring or audit visits to institutions or at the stage of analysis of final reports the NA may find out that there are problems. For instance: Mobility happens without prior bilateral agreements; Fees are charged to incoming students; For student mobility periods no Learning Agreements are signed or no full recognition is given; The institution does not respect the rules established in the contract with the NA

25 After examining the additional information gathered it may occur that : a) The NA concludes that the case was not serious, or that it was a misunderstanding or that the situation has in the meantime already been corrected by the institution. In this event the case can be considered as closed. The NA will write to the head of the institution with its conclusions. b) The NA concludes that the case is serious and it requires corrective action by the institution. The NA has two options : b.1) The NA tries to resolve the problem in the first instance. The NA will write to the head of the institution asking to take the necessary measures to correct the problem within a short delay and mentioning that failure to do so will result in the file being transmitted to the Commission. The NA will send a copy of this letter to the Commission. At the expiration of the delay the NA will either notify the institution that the problem is settled or transmit the file to the Commission b.2) The NA considers that the matter has to be brought to the Commission. The NA will write to the Commission and submit a detailed file with the facts and findings. The file will also include the opinion of the NA on the seriousness of the case and a recommendation on how to deal further with the case.

26 The Commission will examine the file and will communicate to the institution its position while keeping the NA informed. Broadly speaking the Commission has two possibilities: To give a warning and write to the head of the institution to require it to draft an action plan with the measures to be taken. The institution has to write to the Commission after a certain time (for instance 6 months) with the confirmation that indeed the measures have been implemented. ii) In very serious cases, to set in motion the cancellation procedure. The Commission will notify the head of the institution of its intention to cancel the Charter and will offer the institution the possibility to react within 45 days. After this period the Commission may take the final decision to cancel the Charter or may reconsider its decision.

27 In the yearly final report of the Erasmus financial agreement the NA will inform the Commission on all the cases of non compliance.

28 After examining the additional information gathered three situations ions may occur: The Commission concludes that the case was not serious, or that it was a misunderstanding or that the situation has in the meantime already been corrected by the institution. In this event the case can be considered as closed. The Commission will write to the head of the institution with its conclusions. b) The Commission thinks that the case is serious. The Commission decides to give a warning and to require the institution to take corrective action and to draft an action plan with the measures to be taken. The institution has to write to the Commission after a certain time (for instance 6 months) with the confirmation that indeed the measures have been implemented. c) The Commission thinks that the case is very serious and it decides to set in motion the cancellation procedure. The Commission will notify the head of the institution of its intention to cancel the Charter and will offer the institution the possibility to react within 45 days. After this period the Commission may take the final decision to cancel the Charter or may reconsider its decision.

29 In the case of a warning, if the institution fails to implement the action plan, the Commission will also set in motion the cancellation procedure.