ADALET İSTATİSTİKLERİ Judicial Statistics 2007

ADALET İSTATİSTİKLERİ Judicial Statistics 2007 Resmi İstatistik Programı Yayınıdır A Publication of Official Statistics Programme T.C. ADALET BAKANLIĞI ADLİ SİCİL VE İSTATİSTİK GENEL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Justice General Directorate of Judicial Record and Statistics

II MTB: 2008-0881-100 Adet-Copies ISBN 978-975-7978-16-9

Foreword Önsöz ÖNSÖZ FOREWORD Toplumsal analizler veya kurumsal i leyi lerin incelenmesi sonucunda ortaya konulan rakamlar, her zaman sorunlar n çözümünde gerçe e en yak n verileri elde etmemizi sa lar. Rakamlar n dili kesindir. Bu matematiksel kesinlik bir anlamda kesin çözümleri de pe inden getirir. Bilimsel verilerle elde edilen kesin sonuçlar, al nmas gereken tedbirleri, yap lmas gereken plan ve projeleri de do al bir ekilde ortaya koyar. Ça n getirdi i imkanlar ve bilimsel geli melerden yararlanarak yap lan çal malarda neticeye varmak art k son derece kolay hale gelmi tir. Bugün Adli Sicil ve statistik Genel Müdürlü ümüz bilimsel yöntemler kullanarak yarg kurumlar m z n çal malar n n krokisini ç kar yor. Ortaya ç kan sonuçlar, yarg m z n daha iyi adalet da tmas n n yolunu açacak, rotas n belirleyecek derecede önemli buluyorum. Yarg sistemimizin, adalet mekanizmam z n i leyi i hakk nda ortaya ç kan bu veriler, bizlerin ve di er ilgililerin çal malar nda gerçekten önemli bir k lavuzluk görevi icra edecektir. Bu sebeple gelece in Türkiyesinde yüzde yüz adalet için Adli Sicil ve statistik Genel Müdürlü ümüze önemli görevler dü ecektir, diye dü ünüyorum. 1979 Y l ndan bu yana yakla k 30 y ld r ba ar yla çal malar n yürüten Adli Sicil ve statistik Genel Müdürlü ümüz, çok ciddi bir birikim ve tecrübeye sahip. Bu birikim ve tecrübenin ça n sa lad yeni yöntemler ve imkanlarla birle mesi, ülkemiz için bir büyük kazanç. Türkiye olarak tecrübeyle bilimi bulu turdu umuz sürece h zl yol alaca za inan yorum. Presented as a result of viewing social analysis and institutional operations, the figures always enable us to come by the most relevant data to the reality in solving the problems. The language of figures is certain. This mathematical certainty, in a way, comes up with clear solutions. The solutions acquired by the scientific data show the precautions to be taken and plans and projects to be initiated. Through making use of the opportunities and scientific improvements of the age, it has been really easy to reach conclusions on matters dealt with. Today, our Directorate General for Judicial Registration and Statistics is creating the layout of the way our judicial institutions function. I find the outcomes important to the degree that they will help our judiciary dispense better justice and determine its route. These data created about the way our Judicial System and Justice Mechanism function will serve as a guideline for the works of ours and other people concerned. Therefore, I think for a hundred percent justice, our Directorate General for Judicial Registration and Statistics will have to undertake vital responsibilities. The Directorate General for Judicial Registration and Statistics, having successfully been functioning for 30 years since 1979, enjoys a great amount of knowledge and experience. It is of great benefit to have brought this knowledge and experience together with the new policies and opportunities of the contemporary age. I believe that we, as Turkey, will progress very fast so long as we blend science with experience. Adalet te kilat m z n belle i olarak nitelendirdi im Adli Sicil ve statistik Genel Müdürlü ümüzün verileri, bu belle i sadece geçmi e ait olmaktan ç kar yor, gelecek için bir k lavuz bilgi haline getiriyor. Genel Müdürlü ümüz taraf ndan haz rlanan Adli statistikler 2007 kitab n, öncelikle yarg mensuplar m z ve idarecilerimizin kullanaca bir kaynak oldu u dü üncesindeyim. Bu kitap, yarg kurumlar n n performans n da gözden geçirmemizi ve buna göre çal malara giri memizi sa layacak bir veri bankas d r. The data of the Directorate General for Judicial Registration and Statistics, which I also define as the Memory of Justice System, makes this memory as guiding information for the future by detaching it from being related solely to the past. I think The Judicial statistics 2007 book prepared by the Directorate General is a source the Judiciary and Administrators will make use of. This book is a data bank that will enable us to review the performance of the judicial institutions and start some initiatives accordingly. Adalet statistikleri 2007 kitab ile Türk yarg s n n 2007 y l itibariyle durumu tespit edilmi oluyor. Bu çal man n bize gösterdi i en önemli veri ise, yarg mensuplar m z n mevcut i yüküne kar l k ba ar l bir performans ortaya koymalar d r. Yarg m z n geli en Türkiye modeline e zamanl ad mlar bu eserle bir kez daha ortaya konulmu oldu. The 2007 situation of The Turkish Judiciary is analyzed in this Justice Statistics 2007 book. The most significant output of this work is that Judiciary members have been able to exhibit a successful performance considering the present workload. The pace of our Judiciary consistent with the developing Turkey s Model has once more been expressed. Kitab n haz rlanmas nda çaba ve gayretleriyle, bu ciddi birikimi payla ma sunan ve bu birikiminden daha fazla insan n yararlanmas n n yolunu açan ba ta Adli Sicil ve statistik Genel Müdürümüz Abuzer Duran Bey olmak üzere, tüm Genel Müdürlük çal anlar n bir kez daha tebrik ediyorum, adalet te kilat m z ad na kendilerine te ekkür ediyorum. On behalf of the Justice Administration, I once more would like to thank and congratulate Mr. Abuzer Duran, the General Manager of the Judicial Registration and Statistics, and all the personnel, who with all their efforts and energy have shared this significant knowledge in the preparation of this book, thus enabling many people to make use of it. Mehmet Ali ŞAHİN Mehmet Ali AH N Adalet Bakanı Bakan Minister of Justice Minister of Justice III

Introduction Sunuş SUNU INTRODUCTION Gelece in do ru olarak ekillenmesi, ihtiyaca uygun iyi bir planlaman n yap lmas, ulusal ve uluslararas geli me hedeflerinin belirlenmesi, geçmi in sa l kl bir ekilde analizi ve de erlendirilmesi ile mümkündür. Sa l kl bir gelecek ancak sa l kl bir dü üncenin mahsulü olan düzenli, programl bir planlama ile olu ur. Bunun için de geçmi e dayal sa l kl veriler toplanmas, tahlil ve de erlendirilmesi yap larak sa l kl sonuçlar elde etmekle, ba ka bir anlat mla sa l kl bir istatistiksel çal mayla mümkün olur. statistik, kurum ve kurulu lar n geçmi i ve gelece inin rehberi ve yol haritas d r. Geçmi in olgular n do ru olarak toplamak, tahlil etmek ve de erlendirerek belirli sonuçlara varmak, istatistik biliminin konusunu te kil eder. Shaping the future truly is possible with creating a good planning suitable to the needs, setting the targets of national and international developments and analyzing and evaluating the past in a healthy way. A healthy future can be formed only by an organized and well-programmed planning which is the result of healthy thought. With the healthy results of the analysis and evaluations of the data collected in a healthy way can this be possible; in other words, with a healthy statistical work. Statistics is the past of the institutions and the map and the guide to the future. Collecting, analyzing and evaluating the actions of the past truly and reaching to conclusions as a result of these is within the scope of the statistics science. Her dönem ve her toplumda önemli bir sosyal problem olarak görülen suç ve suçluluk, i lenen suçlar n tür ve say sal da l m, hukuki problemler ve çözüm yollar aç s ndan toplumdan topluma farkl l k gösterebilece i gibi, ayn toplum yap s içinde de farkl l klar gösterebilmektedir. Bu nedenledir ki, her toplum kendi yap s içinde suç ve suçlulara yönelik önleyici tedbirler almak, görülen ve de i en araç, gereç ve hukuki geli melere paralel olarak yasal düzenlemeler yapmak sureti ile, bunlar uygulayacak olan birimler olu turup geli tirerek kendi adalet sistemlerini kurmu lard r. Crime and criminality, which are considered as an important social issue in every period and society, can change not only from one community to another, but also in the same community as well in terms of distribution of offenses by type and number, of legal problems and solutions. Therefore, every society has to take preventive measures related to crime and criminals in its own structure and develop legal arrangements parallel to improvements and establish its own justice system by forming units to implement these arrangements. Cumhuriyet dönemi ile birlikte Türk adalet sistemi, ça da ilke ve temellere oturtulan ülkemizde, gerek hukuk sistemimizin ve gerekse adalet mekanizmam z n i leyi i ile ilgili görülen eksiklik ve aksakl klar n düzeltilmesi, ileriye yönelik plan ve programlar n yap lmas için adalet istatistiklerine ihtiyaç oldu u belirlenmi, bu ihtiyac n kar lanmas amac ile Adli Sicil ve statistik Genel Müdürlü ü kurulmu tur. With the Republican Period, Turkish Justice System was based on contemporary principles and basis in our country. To make healthy future plans and programmes related to operations of both legal system and justice mechanism, judicial statistics should be collected and compiled in a healthy way. The General Directorate of Judicial Record and Statistics was established for this purpose. 1979 y l nda kurulan ve 2992 say l Adalet Bakanl Te kilat ve Görevleri Hakk nda Kanun Hükmünde Kararnamenin De i tirilerek Kabulü Hakk nda Kanun un 8 inci maddesi uyar nca Bakanl m z ana hizmet birimlerinden biri olan Genel Müdürlü ümüz, ayn Kanunun 12 nci maddesi gere ince, adli sicil tutmak, adli istatistikleri toplamak ve de erlendirmek gibi iki önemli görevi üstlenmi tir. Bu görevlere ili kin i leri yapabilmek amac ile, bilgi i lem a n kurmak ve geli tirmek görevini de üstlenerek, kurulu undan bu yana her gün daha da geli erek ça n getirdi i imkanlar ve bilimsel geli melerden faydalanmak suretiyle sözü edilen i levlerini ba ar ile yerine getirmektedir. Founded in 1979 under article 8 of the Law which amends and accepts the Decree with the Power of Act No. 2992 on Functions and Duties of Ministry of Justice, the General Directorate has undertaken two important functions, collecting and evaluating judicial statistics in accordance with article 12 of the same law. Having undertaken the task of setting up and developing an IT system, the General Directorate has been successfully performing these tasks by taking advantage of the opportunities and technical developments of the age. 18 Kas m 2005 tarihinde yürürlü e giren 5429 say l Türkiye statistik Kanunu ve bu Kanuna dayan larak 30.12.2006 tarihli Resmi Gazetede yay nlanarak yürürlü e giren ve 2007-2011 y llar n kapsayan Resmi statistik Program kurumumuza ek görev ve sorumluluklar getirmi tir. Law on Turkish Statistical Authority No. 5429 became in effect on November 18, 2005 and Official Statistical Programme belonging to the years 2007-2011 which became in effect after being published in the Official Gazette dated 30.12.2006 have brought additional responsibility and function to our institution. Bu cümleden olarak, daha evvel mahkemeler, Cumhuriyet ba savc l klar ve icra müdürlükleri istatistiklerini derleyip yay nlayan Genel Müdürlü ümüz, adaletle ilgili olup programda belirtilen ve ba ka kurumlar taraf ndan üretilen istatistiki bilgilerin yay n sorumlulu unu da üstlenmi tir. In addition to compilation and publication of statistics of Courts, Chief Public Prosecutors' Offices and enforcement directories, the General Directorate also undertakes the publishing responsibility of statistical information on Justice mentioned in the programme and produced by other institutions. V

Sunuş Introduction Her kurum ve kurulu ta oldu u gibi adalet te kilat nda da adli istatistik, te kilat m z n belle i ve gelece in rehberidir. Te kilat m z n aksayan yönlerinin tespiti ve bunlar n düzeltilmesinde yap lacak her yeni at l mda, hem delil hem de yolumuzu ilk ayd nlatan kt r. Judicial statistics is the memory and the guide to the future within the organization of Justice as in every institution. It both provides proof and enlightens our route in every attempt to be done to detect and better any defective points of our organization. Veriler istatisti in ham maddesidir. Sa l kl bir istatiksel çal ma yapmak, istatistik verilerin sa l kl bir ekilde toplan p de erlendirilmesi ile mümkündür. Bu amaçla titiz bir çal ma sonucu Genel Müdürlü ümüzce haz rlanan 11 adet y ll k, 11 adet üç ayl k olmak üzere geli tirilen toplam 22 adet anket formu ile 8379 adli birimden tam say m esas na göre adli istatistikler istenmekte, bu amaçla her y l Aral k ay sonu itibar ile formlar ilgili adli birimlere gönderilmektedir. Y l sonu devirlerini takiben doldurularak Genel Müdürlü ümüze gönderilen formlar, istatistik yaz l m birimince veri taban ve ekran giri ablonlar n n güncelle tirilmeleri ve kontrollerini takiben, veri giri ve kontrol i letmenlerince veri giri leri tamamlanarak, istatistikçiler taraf ndan hata ay klama ve raporlama programlar yap l p, kitap tablolar n n olu turulmas na ba lanmaktad r. Veri taban na aktar lan bu veriler üzerinde istatistik uzmanlar taraf ndan yap lan çal ma sonucu yaz l m programlar haz rlanarak elde edilen uygun raporlar üzerinden de excell tablolar, grafikler ve istatistiki analizler olu turulmaktad r. Data are the raw material of Statistics. A healthy statistical study is possible by collection and evaluation of data in a healthy way. For this purpose, the General Directorate fastidiously prepares 11 yearly, 11 quarterly - a total of - 22 survey forms. Every year at the end of each December, these forms are sent to 8043 judicial units and judicial statistics are required from these units according to complete counting method. The forms are filled out and sent to the General Directorate. Then data are entered by data entry and control operators after the database and monitor entry templates are updated and controlled by Statistical Software units. Then, error finding and reporting programmes are made and tables are produced by statisticians. As a result of the study held by statisticians on data transferred to data base, software programmes are prepared and reports are provided. Excel tables, graphics and statistical analysis are made in accordance with these reports. Bu yay n n amac, 2007 y l itibar ile, kurumlar m za gelen ve ç kar lan i yükü, kurumlar n performans, k saca Türk yarg s n n genel olarak durumunun tespiti, gerek hukuk sistemimizin ve gerekse adalet mekanizmam z n daha iyi bir i leyi i ile ilgili ileriye yönelik plan ve programlar n yap lmas, gerekli tedbirlerin zaman nda al nmas, yarg mensuplar m z n, idarecilerimizin ve konu ile ilgili ara t rmac lar n kullanaca tam, do ru ve güncel bilgiler içeren bir kaynak olarak sunulmas d r. The purpose of this publication is to make future plans and programmes and take timely precautions about the operation of legal system and justice mechanism so that they work in a better way and provide accurate, complete and up to date information to the Judiciary members, managers and researches in this field. Bu eserin haz rlanmas nda, isteme uygun verileri özenle haz rlay p Genel Müdürlü ümüze gönderen tüm adli ve idari yarg te kilat çal anlar na, Türkiye statistik Kurumu Say n Ba kan ve personeline, dikkatli ve özverili bir çal ma ile büyük katk lar bulunan Genel Müdürlü ümüz personeline te ekkür ederim. I would like to thank all judicial personnel who prepare necessary data and send to the General Directorate and also expert statistics and their personnel at the General Directorate who have contributed greatly with their careful work and devotion for the production of this book. Bu kitab n meslekta lar ma, tüm adalet camias na ve di er kullan c lara yararl olmas dile iyle sayg lar mla sunar m. I hope this book will be beneficial for my colleagues, justice community and all users. Abuzer DURAN Adli Sicil ve statistik Abuzer Genel DURAN Müdürü Director Adli General Sicil of ve Judicial İstatistik Records Genel and Müdürü Statistics Director General of Judicial Record and Statistics VI

Contents İçindekiler Ç NDEK LER CONTENTS Sayfa Page Önsöz III Foreword Sunu V Introduction çindekiler VII Contents Grafik, Harita ve Tablo Listesi VIII List of Graphics, Maps and Tables Simge ve K saltmalar XVI Symbols and Abbreviations Aç klama XIX Explanation I. Tarihi Tablolar, 1998-2007 1 I. Historical Tables, 1998-2007 II. Adalet statistikleri, 2007 II. Judicial Statistics, 2007 1. Adalet Te kilat 12 1. Judicial Organization 2. Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar 39 2. Chief Public Prosecutors' Office 3. Mahkemeler 59 3. Courts Harita 64 Map Ceza Mahkemeleri 68 The Criminal Courts Hukuk Mahkemeleri 143 The Civil Courts dari Mahkemeler 175 The Administrative Courts VII

Grafik, Harita ve Tablo Listesi List of Graphics, Maps and Tables GRAF K, HAR TA ve TABLO L STES Sayfa I. Tarihi Tablolar, 1998-2007 Grafik 1. Yarg tay Ceza Genel Kurulu ve ceza dairelerine gelen, karara ba lanan ve gelecek y la devredilen ceza davalar 2. Yarg tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu ve hukuk dairelerine gelen, karara ba lanan ve gelecek y la devredilen hukuk davalar 3. Dan tay Birinci Daire'nin i durumu 2 4. Dan tay dava dairelerinin i durumu 2 5. CMK 250. madde ile görevli A r Ceza Mahkemeleri Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar soru turma evresi i durumu 6. Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar soru turma evresi i durumu 3 7. Ceza mahkemelerinin i durumu 4 8. Hukuk mahkemelerinin i durumu 4 9. dari mahkemelerin i durumu 5 10. Mahkemelerde (ceza, hukuk ve idari) hakim say s ve bir hakime dü en dava say s 5 1 1 3 Tablo 1. Yarg tay Cumhuriyet Ba savc l 'na gelen, karara ba lanan ve gelecek y la devredilen dosyalar 2. Yarg tay'a gelen, karara ba lanan ve gelecek y la devredilen davalar 6 3. Dan tay dairelerine gelen, karara ba lanan ve gelecek y la devredilen davalar 6 4. Soru turma evresinde Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar na gelen, karara ba lanan ve gelecek y la devreden dosyalar 5. Soru turma evresinde Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar na gelen, karara ba lanan ve gelecek y la devreden faili meçhul dosyalar 6. Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar nda infaz için verilen ilamlar 7 7. Karar türüne göre Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar soru turma evresinde karara ba lanan dosyalar 8. Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar nda faili meçhul olup da zamana m sonuna kadar, daimi aramaya al nan dosyalarda verilen kararlar 9. Mahkeme türüne göre mahkemelere gelen, karara ba lanan ve gelecek y la devredilen davalar 10. Mahkemelerdeki (ceza, hukuk ve idari) hakim say s, mahkemelere gelen ve bir hakime dü en dava say s 11. Mahkeme türüne göre ceza mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalar n gelen davalara oran (%) 12. Mahkeme ve karar türüne göre ceza mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalardaki san klar 13. Ceza mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalarda, san klar hakk nda verilen mahkumiyet kararlar 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 9 10 11 VIII

List of Graphics, Maps and Tables Grafik, Harita ve Tablo Listesi LIST OF GRAPHICS, MAPS and TABLES Page I. Historical Tables, 1998-2007 Graph 1. Criminal cases brought, judged and postponed until next year at the General Board of Criminal Department and criminal departments of the Supreme Court 2. Civil cases brought, judged and postponed until next year at the General Board of Civil Department and civil departments of the Supreme Court 3. Activities of the First Department of the Council of State 2 4. Activities of the lawsuit departments of the Council of State 2 5. Activities of the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office of High Ciriminal Courts (assigned by article 250 of CCP) in the investigation stage 6. Activities of the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office in the investigation stage 3 7. Activities of the criminal courts 4 8. Activities of the civil courts 4 9. Activities of the administrative courts 5 10. Number of judges in the courts (criminal, civil and administrative) and cases per judge 5 1 1 3 Table 1. Cases brought, judged and postponed until next year at the Chief Public Prosecutor's Office of the Supreme Court 2. Cases brought, judged and postponed until next year at the Supreme Court 6 3. Cases brought, judged and postponed until next year at the Council of State departments 4. Cases brought, judged and postponed until next year in the investigation stage of the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office 5. Cases of unknown offenders brought, judged and postponed until next year in the investigation stage of the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office 6. Decree for execution rendered at the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office 7 7. Cases judged in the investigation stage of the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office by decision types 8. Decisions judged in cases pending until the expiration of time limit due to unknown offender at the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office 9. Cases brought, judged and postponed until next year by type of court 9 10. Number of judges in the courts (criminal, civil and administrative), cases brought to courts and cases per judge 11. Ratio of cases judged at the criminal courts to cases brought by type of court (%) 9 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 12. Accused persons in cases judged at the criminal courts by type of court and decision 10 13. Sentence decisions rendered about accused persons in judged cases at the criminal courts 11 IX

Grafik, Harita ve Tablo Listesi List of Graphics, Maps and Tables II. Adalet statistikleri, 2007 Sayfa 1. Adalet Te kilat Grafik 1.1 Karar türüne göre Yarg tay Ceza Genel Kurulu ve ceza dairelerinde karara ba lanan ceza davalar 1.2 Karar türüne göre Yarg tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu ve hukuk dairelerinde karara ba lanan hukuk davalar 1.3 Karar türüne göre ilk derece incelenen davalar 13 1.4 Karar türüne göre temyizen incelenen davalar 13 12 12 Tablo 1.1 Anayasa Mahkemesi personel durumu 14 1.2 Anayasa Mahkemesi'ne gelen, karara ba lanan ve gelecek y la devredilen iptal ve itiraz davalar 1.3 Yarg tay Cumhuriyet Ba savc l nca siyasi partiler hakk nda aç lan ihtar ve kapatma 14 davalar 1.4 Anayasa Mahkemesi'ne gelen, karara ba lanan ve gelecek y la devredilen siyasi parti mali denetimi 1.5 Yarg tay personel durumu 15 1.6 Yarg tay'a gelen, karara ba lanan ve gelecek y la devredilen davalar 15 1.7 Dan tay personel durumu 16 1.8 Dan tay dava dairelerine gelen, karara ba lanan ve gelecek y la devredilen davalar 16 1.9 Dava konusuna göre Dan tay dava dairelerine gelen, karara ba lanan ve gelecek y la devredilen davalar 1.10 Dan tay dava dairelerinde karar türüne göre karara ba lanan davalar 18 1.11 Dan tay dava dairelerine göre y l içinde davan n aç lmas nda yürütmeyi durdurma istemli dosya say s ile geçmi y llardan devredilenler dahil karara ba lanan dosyalar 1.12 Dan tay Birinci Daire'de dava konusu ve karar türüne göre karara ba lanan davalar 19 14 14 17 18 1.13 Dan tay Birinci Daire'de 4483 ve 2547 Say l Kanun'a göre karara ba lanan dosyalar n incelenme nedeni, derecesi ve davac lar 1.14 Dan tay Birinci Daire'de 4483 ve 2547 Say l Kanun'a göre karara ba lanan dosyalar n suç ve karar türü 1.15 Yüksek Hakem Kurulu personel ve i durumu 23 1.16 Uyu mazl k Mahkemesi personel ve i durumu 23 1.17 Savc, hakim ve Adalet Bakanl 'nda çal an di er personel say s 23 1.18 Baro bulunan illerde baroya kay tl avukat ve dava vekilleri 24 1.19 Adli T p Kurumu ihtisas kurullar ve ihtisas daireleri i durumu 24 19 20 1.20 Adli T p Kurumu ube müdürlüklerinin i durumu 25 X

List of Graphics, Maps and Tables Grafik, Harita ve Tablo Listesi II. Judicial Statistics, 2007 Page 1. Judicial Organization Graph 1.1 Criminal cases judged at the General Board of Criminal Department and criminal departments of the Supreme Court by type of judgement 1.2 Civil cases judged at the General Board of Civil Department and civil departments of the Supreme Court by type of judgement 1.3 Cases of the first instance by type of judgement 13 1.4 Cases of appeal by type of judgement 13 12 12 Table 1.1 Personnel of the Constitutional Court 14 1.2 Actions of annulment and objection brought, judged and postponed until next year at the Constitutional Court 1.3 Actions of caution and closing about political parties filed by the Supreme Court 14 14 1.4 Cases brought, judged and postponed until next year at the Constitutional Court regarding financial supervision of political parties 1.5 Personnel of the Supreme Court 15 1.6 Cases brought, judged and postponed until next year at the Supreme Court 15 1.7 Personnel of the Council of State 16 1.8 Cases brought, judged and postponed until next year at the lawsuit departments of the Council of State 1.9 Cases brought, judged and postponed until next year at the lawsuit departments of the Council of State by subject of case 1.10 Cases judged at the lawsuit departments of the Council of State by type of judgement 18 1.11 Cases related to the demand of stay of execution at the time of filing cases within the year and judged cases included transferred cases from the past years by lawsuit departments of the Council of State 1.12 Cases judged at the First Department of the Council of State by subject of case and type of judgement 1.13 Reason for examination and level of review of the files judged at the First Department of the Council of State by the Law No. 4483 and 2547 and plaintiffs 1.14 Type of judgement and crime of files judged at the First Department of the Council of State by the Law No. 4483 and 2547 1.15 Personnel and activities of the High Board of Arbitration 23 1.16 Personnel and activities of the Court of Jurisdictional Disputes 23 1.17 Number of prosecutors, judges and other personnel in the Ministry of Justice 23 1.18 Lawyers and counsellors registered with the Bar Association by province 24 1.19 Activities of the specialized boards and specialized departments of the Council of Forensic Medicine 1.20 Activities of the directorates of the Council of Forensic Medicine 25 14 16 17 18 19 19 20 24 XI

Grafik, Harita ve Tablo Listesi List of Graphics, Maps and Tables Sayfa 1.21 Askeri Adalet Te kilat personel durumu 31 1.22 Askeri Adalet Te kilat i durumu 31 1.23 Askeri ceza ve tutukevine giren, ç kan tutuklu ve hükümlüler 32 1.24 llere göre noterlik ve yetkili noterlikler 33 1.25 llere göre noterliklerin i lem türü 34 1.26 cra müdürlüklerinin i durumu 38 2. Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar Grafik 2.1 Karar türüne göre A r Ceza Mahkemesi (CMK 250. madde ile görevli) Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar soru turma evresi çal malar 2.2 Karar türüne göre Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar soru turma evresi çal malar 40 39 2.3 Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar nca verilen kovu turmaya yer olmad karar n n nedenlerine göre da l m 40 Tablo 2.1 llere göre A r Ceza Mahkemesi (CMK 250. madde ile görevli) Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar soru turma evresi i durumu 2.2 llere göre A r Ceza Mahkemesi (CMK 250. madde ile görevli) Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar soru turma evresinde verilen kararlar 2.3 llere göre A r Ceza Mahkemesi (CMK 250. madde ile görevli) Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar nda faili meçhul olup da zamana m sonuna kadar daimi aramaya al nan dosyalar 2.4 llere göre A r Ceza Mahkemesi (CMK 250. madde ile görevli) Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar ilamat i leri 2.5 BBS 3. düzeye göre Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar soru turma evresi i durumu 44 42 42 43 43 2.6 BBS 3. düzeye göre Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar soru turma evresinde verilen kararlar 47 2.7 BBS 3. düzeye göre Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar nda faili meçhul olup da zamana m sonuna kadar daimi aramaya al nan dosyalar 2.8 BBS 3. düzeye göre Cumhuriyet Ba savc l klar ilamat i leri 55 3. Mahkemeler Ceza Mahkemeleri - Hukuk Mahkemeleri - dari Mahkemeler 52 Grafik 3.1 Türk Ceza Kanunu ve özel kanunlara göre ceza mahkemelerine aç lan davalar 59 3.2 Türk Ceza Kanunu'na göre ceza mahkemelerine aç lan davalar 60 XII

List of Graphics, Maps and Tables Grafik, Harita ve Tablo Listesi Page 1.21 Personnel of the Military Judicial Organization 31 1.22 Activities of the Military Judicial Organization 31 1.23 Arrested and convicts received into and discharged from military prison and detention house 32 1.24 Notary publics and authorized notary publics by province 33 1.25 Types of notary transaction by province 34 1.26 Activities of the enforcement directories 38 2. Chief Public Prosecutors' Office Graph 2.1 Activities in the investigation stage at the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office of High Criminal Courts (assigned by article 250 of CCP) by type of judgement 2.2 Activities in the investigation stage at the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office by type of judgement 2.3 Distribution of reasons for judgement of no investigation by the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office 39 40 40 Table 2.1 Activities in the investigation stage at the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office of High Criminal Courts (assigned by article 250 of CCP) by provinces 2.2 Decisions judged in the investigation stage of the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office of High Criminal Courts (assigned by article 250 of CCP) by provinces 2.3 Cases pending until the expiration of time limit due to unknown offender at the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office of High Criminal Courts (assigned by article 250 of CCP) by provinces 2.4 Procedures related with decree of the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office of High Criminal Courts (assigned by article 250 of CCP) by provinces 2.5 Activities in the investigation stage at the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office by SRE, level 3 2.6 Decisions judged in the investigation stage at the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office by SRE, level 3 2.7 Cases pending until the expiration of time limit due to unknown offender at the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office by SRE, level 3 2.8 Procedures related with decree of the Chief Public Prosecutors' Office by SRE, level 3 55 3. Courts The Criminal Courts - The Civil Courts - The Administrative Courts 42 42 43 43 44 47 52 Graph 3.1 Cases filed at the criminal courts by Turkish Criminal Law and special laws 59 3.2 Cases filed at the criminal courts under Turkish Criminal Law 60 XIII

Grafik, Harita ve Tablo Listesi List of Graphics, Maps and Tables Sayfa 3.3 Özel kanunlara göre ceza mahkemelerine aç lan davalar 60 3.4 Ceza mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalar n aç l y llar 61 3.5 Karar türüne göre ceza mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalardaki san klar 61 3.6 Seçilmi dava türüne göre hukuk mahkemelerine aç lan davalar 62 3.7 Karar türüne göre hukuk mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalar 62 3.8 dari mahkemelerin i durumu 63 Harita 3.1 BBS, 3. düzeyde, Türk Ceza Kanunu'na göre ceza mahkemelerine aç lan davalarda ilk s ray alan suç 3.2 BBS, 3. düzeyde, özel kanunlara göre ceza mahkemelerine aç lan davalarda ilk s ray alan suç 3.3 BBS, 1. düzeyde, Türk Ceza Kanunu'na göre ceza mahkemelerine aç lan davalarda ilk 3 s ray alan suçlar (%) 3.4 BBS, 1. düzeyde, özel kanunlara göre ceza mahkemelerine aç lan davalarda ilk 3 s ray alan suçlar (%) 64 65 66 67 Ceza Mahkemeleri Tablo 3.1 Mahkeme türüne göre ceza mahkemelerinin i durumu 68 3.2 Mahkeme ve karar türüne göre karara ba lanan davalardaki san klar 68 3.3 llere göre A r Ceza Mahkemelerinin (CMK 250. madde ile görevli) i durumu 69 3.4 BBS 3. düzeye ve ilçelere göre A r Ceza Mahkemelerinin i durumu 69 3.5 BBS 3. düzeyde, mahkeme türüne göre ceza mahkemelerinin i durumu 74 3.6 Ceza mahkemelerinde ya grubuna göre san klar 81 3.7 TCK ve özel kanunlar uyar nca ceza mahkemelerine aç lan dava ve ya grubuna göre san klar 3.8 TCK ve özel kanunlara göre ceza mahkemelerine aç lan dava, ma dur veya mü tekiler 98 3.9 BBS 1. düzeye göre ceza mahkemelerine aç lan dava, san k, ma dur veya mü tekiler 107 91 3.10 Mahkeme türü ve davan n aç l y l na göre ceza mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan dava, san k, ma dur veya mü tekiler 3.11 TCK ve özel kanunlara göre ceza mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan dava ve ya grubuna göre san klar 3.12 TCK ve özel kanunlara göre ceza mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan dava ve ya grubuna göre haklar nda mahkumiyet karar verilen san klar 3.13 TCK, özel kanunlar ve davan n aç l y l na göre ceza mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalar 3.14 TCK ve özel kanunlara göre ceza mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan dava, ma dur veya mü tekiler 107 108 115 122 131 XIV

List of Graphics, Maps and Tables Grafik, Harita ve Tablo Listesi Page 3.3 Cases filed at the criminal courts under special laws 60 3.4 Filing years of cases judged at the criminal courts 61 3.5 Accused persons in cases judged at the criminal courts by type of decisions 61 3.6 Cases filed at the civil courts by type of selected case 62 3.7 Cases judged at the civil courts by type of decisions 62 3.8 Cases at the administrative courts 63 Map 3.1 The most frequently committed offence in cases filed at the criminal courts by the Turkish Criminal Law at SRE, level 3 3.2 The most frequently committed offence in cases filed at the criminal courts by special laws at SRE, level 3 3.3 The first three offences frequently committed in cases filed at by the Turkish Criminal Law at SRE, level 1 (%) 3.4 The first three offences frequently committed in cases filed to the criminal courts by special laws at SRE, level 1 (%) 64 65 66 67 The Criminal Courts Table 3.1 Cases at the criminal courts by type of court 68 3.2 Accused persons in judged cases by type of court and decision 68 3.3 Cases at the High Criminal Courts (assigned by article 250 of CCP) by provinces 69 3.4 Cases at the High Criminal Courts by SRE, level 3 and districts 69 3.5 Cases at the criminal courts by type of court at SRE, level 3 74 3.6 Accused persons at the criminal courts by age group 81 3.7 Cases filed at the criminal courts under TCL and special laws and accused persons by age group 3.8 Cases filed at the criminal courts under TCL and special laws and victims or complainants 98 3.9 Accused persons, victims or complainants and cases filed at the criminal courts by SRE, level 1 3.10 Accused persons, victims or complainants and cases judged at the criminal courts by type of court and filing year of a case 3.11 Cases judged at the criminal courts under TCL and special laws and accused persons by age group 3.12 Cases judged at the criminal courts under TCL and special laws and accused persons sentenced by age group 3.13 Cases judged at the criminal courts by TCL, special laws and filing year of a case 122 91 107 107 108 115 3.14 Victims or complainants and cases judged at the criminal courts by TCL and special laws 131 XV

Grafik, Harita ve Tablo Listesi List of Graphics, Maps and Tables Sayfa 3.15 Mahkeme türüne göre ceza mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalarda haklar nda güvenlik tedbiri uygulanmas na hükmedilen san klar 3.16 BBS 3. düzeye göre ceza mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalarda haklar nda güvenlik tedbiri uygulanmas na hükmedilen san klar 140 141 Hukuk Mahkemeleri Tablo 3.17 BBS 3. düzeyde, mahkeme türüne göre hukuk mahkemelerinin i durumu 143 3.18 Dava türüne göre hukuk mahkemelerine aç lan dava, davac ve daval lar 153 3.19 Mahkeme ve karar türüne göre hukuk mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalar 157 3.20 Mahkeme türü ve davan n aç l y l na göre hukuk mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan dava, davac ve daval lar 3.21 Mahkeme ve karar türüne göre hukuk mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalardaki davac ve daval lar 3.22 Dava türü ve davan n aç l y l na göre hukuk mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalar 158 3.23 Dava ve mahkeme türüne göre hukuk mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalar 163 3.24 Dava türüne göre hukuk mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan dava, davac ve daval lar 167 3.25 Dava ve karar türüne göre hukuk mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalar 171 157 157 dari Mahkemeler Tablo 3.26 Dava konusuna göre bölge idare mahkemelerinin i durumu 175 3.27 Dava konusuna ve karar türüne göre bölge idare mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalar 3.28 Dava konusuna ve karar türüne göre idare mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalar 179 3.29 Dava konusuna göre idare mahkemelerinin i durumu 180 3.30 Dava konusuna göre vergi mahkemelerinin i durumu 188 3.31 Dava konusuna ve karar türüne göre vergi mahkemelerinde karara ba lanan davalar 192 178 Simge ve K saltmalar - : Bilgi yoktur TCK : Türk Ceza Kanunu T.C. : Türkiye Cumhuriyeti YÖK : Yüksekö retim Kurulu BBS : statistiki Bölge Birimleri S n flamas CMK : Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu SK : Say l Kanun XVI

List of Graphics, Maps and Tables Grafik, Harita ve Tablo Listesi 3.15 Accused persons judged as applying security measures at the criminal courts by type of court 3.16 Accused persons judged as applying security measures at the criminal courts by SRE, level 3 141 Page 140 The Civil Courts Table 3.17 Cases at the civil courts by type of court at SRE, level 3 143 3.18 Defendants, plaintiffs and cases filed at the civil courts by type of case 153 3.19 Cases judged at the civil courts by type of court and judgement 157 3.20 Defendants, plaintiffs and cases judged at the civil courts by type of court and year of filing a case 3.21 Defendants and plaintiffs in cases judged at the civil courts by type of judgement and court 3.22 Cases judged at the civil courts by type of case and year of filing 158 3.23 Cases judged at the civil courts by type of case and court 163 3.24 Cases judged at the civil courts by type of case, plaintiffs and defendants 167 3.25 Cases judged at the civil courts by type of case and judgement 171 157 157 The Administrative Courts Table 3.26 Cases at the district administrative courts by subject of case 175 3.27 Cases judged at the district administrative courts by subject of case and type of judgement 3.28 Cases judged at the administrative courts by subject of case and type of judgement 179 3.29 Cases at the administrative courts by subject of case 180 3.30 Cases at the tax courts by subject of case 188 3.31 Cases judged at the tax courts by subject of case and type of judgement 192 178 Symbols and Abbreviations - : Denotes magnitude nil TCL T.R. YÖK SRE CCP SL : Turkish Criminal Law : Republic of Turkey : Council of Higher Education : Classification of Statistical Region Units : Code of Criminal Procedure : Law No. XVII

Explanation Açıklama AÇIKLAMA EXPLANATION 1. Giri 1. Introduction Tüm dünya ülkelerinde oldu u gibi ülkemizde de gelece in, ihtiyaçlar do rultusunda do ru olarak ekillendirilmesi, geçmi in iyi tahlil edilmesi ile mümkündür. Hukuk sistemimizin i leyi i ile ilgili eksikliklerin ve aksakl klar n giderilip düzeltilmesi, ileriye yönelik plan ve programlar n yap lmas, yeni projelerin üretilmesi sürecinde bu alanla ilgili olarak göstergelere ihtiyaç duyulaca yads namaz bir gerçektir. Bu göstergelerin hesaplanmas nda kullan lan verilerin önemli bir k sm n Adalet statistiklerinde bulmak mümkündür. Adalet istatistikleri adli birimlere ait verileri, yarg daki davalar n seyri ile suç ve suçluluk hareketleri ve ülke genelindeki da l m n, davalardaki karar türlerini, san k, mü teki, ma dur ve taraflara ili kin bilgileri içermektedir. In order to form future within the course of needs, the past should be analysed well in our country, like in the other countries of the world. It is an undeniable fact that, to overcome deficiencies and shortcomings in the operation of our law system, to make future plans and programmes in the process of new projects, people need some indicators related to that field. It is possible to find significant part of these data used to account these indicators in Judicial Statistics. Judicial statistics contains data on supreme courts, course of cases, crime and criminality trends and their distribution on the country level, information on decision types, accused persons, complainants, victims and parties in cases. 2. Tarihçe 2. Background Adli istatistik verileri, Adalet Bakanl Ceza leri Genel Müdürlü ü'ne ba l ube müdürlü ü taraf ndan tutulmaktayken, bu görev 1979 y l nda kurulan Adli Sicil ve statistik Genel Müdürlü ü'ne verilmi ve ilk kez 1982 y l nda Adalet statistikleri Y ll yay mlanm t r. While judicial record data were kept by a department affiliated to the General Directorate of Criminal Affairs, Ministry of Justice. This responsibility was given to the General Directorate of Judicial Record and Statistics which was established in 1979 and the first Judicial Statistics Yearbook was published in 1982. 1986 y l nda Devlet statistik Enstitüsü ile veri al veri i konusunda mutabakata var lm ve her y l Genel Müdürlü ümüzce mahkeme, Cumhuriyet savc l klar ve icra müdürlüklerinden derlenen ve yay nlanan veriler ayr ca Enstitüye iletilmi tir. Farkl la an ve artan bilgi talepleri ile de i en mevzuat n etkisiyle istatistik anket formlar revizyona u ram, yeni anket formlar geli tirilmi, yay n n içeri i sürekli geni letilerek ve 30.12.2006 tarih ve 26392 say l Resmi Gazete'de yay mlanarak yürürlü e giren 2007-2011 Resmi statistik Program gere i format de i erek bugünkü halini alm t r. It was reached an agreement on data exchange between General Directorate and State Institute of Statistics. Therefore, General Directorate compiled data from courts, Public prosecutors' offices and enforcement directorates and published yearly. The data were also given to the Institute. With the various and increasing request of information and with the influence of the current legislation, the statistical survey forms have been revised, new survey forms have been developed and the content of publication has been widened. As a result, the format has come to its final form in accordance with the Official Statistics Programme 2007-2011 which became in effect after being published in the Official Gazette dated 30.12.2006 with the Law Number 26392. XIX

Açıklama Explanation Adalet istatistikleri kapsam nda de erlendirilen, Anayasa Mahkemesi, Yarg tay, Dan tay, Uyu mazl k Mahkemesi, Askeri Yarg tay, Askeri Yüksek dare Mahkemesi, Milli Savunma Bakanl Askeri Adalet leri Ba kanl, Yüksek Hakem Kurulu, Türkiye Noterler Birli i ve Adli T p Kurumu'na ait veriler, Türkiye statistik Kurumu'nca posta yoluyla y ll k olarak, kurumlar n idari kay tlar ndan tablo eklindeki formlarla derlenerek Genel Müdürlü ümüze gönderilmi ve yay na dahil edilmi tir. In the content of judicial statistics, data on the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court, the Council of State, the Court of Jurisdictional Disputes, the Military Supreme Court, the Military High Administration Court, the Ministry of National Defence Military Justice Affairs Department, High Arbitration Committee, Turkish Notary Public Union, Division of Forensic Medicine, have been compiled and sent to the General Directorate by Turkish Statistical Institute and included in the publication. 3. Amaç 3. Purpose Amaç, yarg sisteminde ve adalet mekanizmas nda gelece e yön verebilmek ad na, ça n gereklerine paralel olarak ileriye yönelik plan ve programlar n yap lmas, ihtiyaçlara cevap verecek tedbirlerin zaman nda al nmas n n sa lanmas, karar al c lar n, ara t rmac lar n ve di er ulusal ve uluslararas kullan c lar n veri taleplerinin kar lanmas d r. The purpose of this study is to be a future guide for legal system and justice mechanism by making plans and programmes parallel to the requirements of the age and enable timely precautions that will meet the needs, and provide data required by decision makers, researches and domestic and international users. 4. Kapsam 4. Coverage Co rafi kapsam: Türkiye çap nda il ve ilçelerdeki mahkemeler, Cumhuriyet savc l klar ve icra müdürlükleri ile Anayasa Mahkemesi, Yarg tay, Dan tay, Uyu mazl k Mahkemesi, Askeri Yarg tay, Askeri Yüksek dare Mahkemesi, Milli Savunma Bakanl Askeri Adalet leri Ba kanl, Yüksek Hakem Kurulu, Türkiye Noterler Birli i ve Adli T p Kurumu. Geographical Coverage: Courts, Public Prosecutors' Offices, enforcement directories in provinces and districts in all over Turkey and the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court, the Council of State, Court of Jurisdictional Disputes, Military Supreme Court, Military High Administrative Court, the Ministry of National Defence, the Department of Military Justice Affairs, High Arbitration Committee, Turkish Notary Public Union, Division of Forensic Medicine. 5. Yöntem 5. Method Veri derleme tekni i: Cumhuriyet savc l klar, mahkemeler ve icra müdürlüklerine ait bilgiler Genel Müdürlü ümüzce tanzim edilen "Cumhuriyet Ba savc l statistik Formu"(AD S FORM 8), "Ceza Mahkemesi statistik Formu" (AD S FORM 9,10,11), "Hukuk Mahkemesi statistik Formu" (AD S FORM 12,13,14), "Bölge dare Mahkemesi statistik Formu" (AD S FORM 16)," dare Mahkemesi statistik Formu" (AD S FORM 17), "Vergi Mahkemesi statistik Formu" (AD S FORM 18), " cra Müdürlü ü statistik Formu" (AD S FORM 19) ile posta yoluyla y ll k olarak, ilgili birimlerin idari kay tlar ndan tamsay m esas na göre derlenmektedir. Data compiling method: Data on courts, Chief Public Prosecutors' Offices and enforcement directories are annually compiled from the records of related units by the General Directorate on the basis of complete count method through "Statistical Form of Chief Public Prosecutors' Offices" (ADIS FORM 8), "Statistical Form of Criminal Courts" (ADIS FORM 9, 10, 11), "Statistical Form of Civil Courts", (ADIS FORM 12, 13, 14) "Statistical Form of District Administrative Courts" (ADIS FORM 16), "Statistical Form of Administrative Court" (ADIS FORM 17), "Statistical Form of Tax Court" (AD S FORM 18), "Statistical Form of Enforcement Directory" (AD S FORM 19) by post. Genel Müdürlü ümüzde, istatistik formlar editkod i lemi, veri kayd, analizi ve raporlamas yap lmakta, y ll k olarak internet adresimizde ve bas l ortamda yay mlanmaktad r. In the General Directorate, edit-code operations of statistical forms, data entry, data analysis and reporting are carried out and published both on our web site and as a publication annually. XX

Explanation Açıklama 6. Tan m ve Kavramlar 6. Definitions and Concepts Anayasa Mahkemesi: Kanunlar n, kanun hükmünde kararnamelerin ve Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi çtüzü ü'nün Anayasa'ya ekil ve esas bak mlar ndan uygunlu unu denetler (Anayasa, Mad. 148). Yarg tay: Adliye mahkemelerince verilen ve kanunun ba ka bir adli yarg merciine b rakmad karar ve hükümlerin son inceleme merciidir. Kanunla gösterilen belli davalara da ilk ve son derece mahkemesi olarak bakar (Anayasa, Mad. 154). Dan tay: dari mahkemelerce verilen ve kanunun ba ka bir idari yarg merciine b rakmad karar ve hükümlerin son inceleme merciidir. Kanunla gösterilen belli davalara da ilk ve son derece mahkemesi olarak bakar. Dan tay, davalar görmek, Ba bakan ve Bakanlar Kurulu'nca gönderilen kanun tasar lar hakk nda dü üncesini bildirmek, tüzük tasar lar n ve imtiyaz artla ma ve sözle melerini incelemek, idari uyu mazl klar çözümlemek ve kanunla gösterilen di er i leri yapmakla görevlidir (Anayasa, Mad. 155). Askeri Yarg tay: Askeri mahkemelerce verilen karar ve hükümlerin son inceleme merciidir. Ayr ca, asker ki ilerin kanunla gösterilen belli davalar na ilk ve son derece mahkemesi olarak bakar (Anayasa, Mad. 156). Askeri Yüksek dare Mahkemesi: Askeri olmayan makamlarca tesis edilmi olsa bile, asker ki ileri ilgilendiren ve askeri hizmete ili kin idari i lem ve eylemlerden do an uyu mazl klar n yarg denetimini yapan ilk ve son derece mahkemesidir (Anayasa, Mad. 157). The Constitutional Court: The Constitutional Court reviews the constitutionality of laws, government decrees with the power of law and the by-laws of the Turkish Grand National Assembly (Constitution, Art. 148). The Supreme Court: The Supreme Court is the court of last instance for reviewing the decisions and verdicts rendered by courts of law and in matters not referred by law to other courts of law. It has first and final jurisdiction in specific cases defined by law (Constitution, Art. 154). The Council of State: The Council of State is the court of last instance for reviewing the decisions and verdicts rendered by administrative courts and in matters not referred to other courts of administration by law. It has first and final jurisdiction in specific cases defined by law. The Council of State hears and settles administrative disputes and suits; expresses opinions on draft laws submitted by the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers; examines draft regulations, specifications and contracts of consessions; and discharges other duties as prescribed by law (Constitution, Art. 155). The Military Supreme Court: The Military Supreme Court is the court of the last instance to review decisions and verdicts rendered by military courts. Furthermore, it hears specific cases as a court of the first and last instance involving military matters as prescribed by law (Constitution, Art. 156). The Military High Administrative Court: The Military High Administrative Court is the court of the first and the last instance to review disputes appeared by administrative procedures related to the military service and military person even if it is caused by the nonmilitary authorities (Constitution, Art. 157). Uyu mazl k Mahkemesi: Adli, idari ve askeri yarg mercileri aras ndaki görev ve hüküm uyu mazl klar n kesin olarak çözümlemeye yetkilidir (Anayasa, Mad. 158). The Court of Jurisdictional Disputes: The Court of Jurisdictional Disputes is empowered to settle disputes among juridical, administrative, and military courts arising from disagreements on jurisdictional matters and verdicts (Constitution, Art. 158). XXI

Açıklama Explanation Yüksek Hakem Kurulu: Grevin ve lokavt n yasak oldu u veya ertelendi i i ler ile yerlerdeki uyu mazl klarda toplu sözle me görü melerinden belirli bir zaman içinde anla ma sa lanmamas üzerine toplu sözle menin imzalanmas na mutlak anlamda yetkili ve Yarg tay' n i davalar na bakan dairesininin ba kan n n ba kanl nda toplanan bir kuruldur (2822 say l Toplu Sözle mesi, Grev ve Lokavt Kanunu, Mad. 52 ve devam ). Adli T p Kurumu: Adalet i lerinde bilirki ilik görevi yapmak, adli t p uzmanl ve yan dal uzmanl programlar ile görev alan na giren konularda di er adli bilimler alanlar nda sempozyum, konferans ve benzeri etkinlikler düzenlemek ve bunlara ili kin e itim programlar uygulamak üzere Adalet Bakanl na ba l Adli T p Kurumu kurulmu tur (2659 say l Adli T p Kurumu Kanunu, Mad. 1). Askeri Adalet leri Ba kanl : Askeri mahkemelerin idari i leri ile askeri savc l klar n bütün i lemleri Milli Savunma Bakan 'n n gözetimine tabidir. Bu görev Bakanl k Askeri Adalet leri Ba kanl arac l ile yürütülür (353 say l Askeri Mahkemeler Kurulu u ve Yarg lama Usulü Kanunu, Mad. 35). Türkiye Noterler Birli i: Noterlik mesle inin amaçlar na uygun bir ekilde görülmesini, mesle in geli mesini ve meslekta lar aras nda birlik ve yard mla may sa lamak üzere, kamu kurumu niteli inde ve tüzel ki ili e sahip birliktir. Birli in merkezi Ankara'dad r (1512 say l Noterlik Kanunu, Mad. 163). cra Müdürlü ü: laml, ilams z icra takipleri ile iflas ve talimat i lerine bakmakla görevlendirilmi adli bir birimdir. High Arbitration Committee: High Arbitration Committee is a committee chaired by the Supreme Court, Head of Department responsible for Cases of Labour and is fully authorized in signing of the collective agreement where disputes arise because strike and lockout are prohibited or postponed, and an agreement is not made for a certain period of time (Law on Collective Labour Agrement, Strike and Lockout No. 2822, Art. 52). Division of Forensic Medicine: Division of Forensic Medicine is an institution, which is affiliated to the Ministry of Justice. It has been established in order to function as an expert on judicial matters, arrange programmes on forensic medicine expertism and minor branch expertism and organize symposiums, conferences and similar activities in the field concerned and other judicial sciences and apply educational programmes related to such (Law on Division of Forensic Medicine No. 2659, Art. 1). The Department of Military Justice Affairs: The administrative affairs of military courts and all procedures of military public prosecutor s offices are under the supervision of the National Defence Minister. This assignment is implemented through the Department of Military Justice Affairs (Law on Establishment of Military Courts and Trial Procedures No. 353, Art. 35). Turkish Notary Public Union: Turkish Notary Public Union enables the implementation of the profession of Notaryship appropriate to its purpose, makes progress in the profession, and enables unity and assistance among colleaques. Turkish Notary Public Union is in the nature of a public institution and has a legal entity. The headquarter of the Union is in Ankara (Notaryship Law No. 1512, Art. 163). Enforcement Directory: Enforcement Directory is a judicial unit assigned to deal with enforcement process with and without judgement, process of bankruptcy and rogatory. 5237 Say l Kanun: Türk Ceza Kanunu. Law No. 5237: Turkish Criminal Law. 4483 Say l Kanun: Memurlar n ve Di er Kamu Görevlilerinin Yarg lanmas Hakk nda Kanun. Law No. 4483: Law pertaining to trials of civil servants and other public officers. 5271 Say l Kanun: Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu. Law No. 5271: Code of Criminal Procedure. XXII