International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (IJONTE)

International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (IJONTE) July, 2013 Volume: 4 Issue: 3 ISSN 1309-6249 http://ijonte.org

July 2013 Volume: 4 Issue: 3 ISSN 1309-6249 Contact Addresses Indexed by Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya, Gazi Üniversitesi, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü Tenik Okullar Ankara/Türkiye E. Mail: ijonte2010@gmail.com Prof. Dr. Uğur Demiray, Anadolu Üniversitesi, İletişim Bilimleri Fakültesi, Yunusemre Kampüsü, 26470 Eskişehir/Türkiye E. Mail: udemiray33@gmail.com Phone: +905422322167 Assist. Prof. Dr. Ilknur Istifci, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Yabancı Diller Yüksek Okulu, İki Eylül Kampusü, 26470 Eskişehir/Türkiye E. Mail: ilk@ijonte.org or iistifci@gmail.com Phone: +902223350580 Sponsors Copyright International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications / www.ijonte.org i

July 2013 Volume: 4 Issue: 3 ISSN 1309-6249 Editors Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya, Gazi University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Uğur Demiray, Anadolu University, Turkey Associate Editor Assist. Prof. Dr. Ilknur Istifci, Anadolu University, Turkey Assistant Editors Ufuk Tanyeri, Gazi University, Turkey Nazan Dogruer, Eastern Mediterranean University,TRNC Ramadan Eyyam, Eastern Mediterranean University, TRNC Ipek Menevis, Eastern Mediterranean University, TRNC Editorial Board Prof. Dr. Abdul Hakim Juri, University of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Prof. Dr. Ahmet Mahiroğlu, Gazi University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Ahmet Pehlivan, Cyprus International University,TRNC Prof. Dr. Alan Smith, The University of Southern Queensland, Australia Prof. Dr. Ali H. Raddaoui, University of Sfax, Tunisia Prof. Dr. Ali Şimşek, Anadolu University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Antoinette J. Muntjewerff, Amsterdam University, Netherlands Prof. Dr. Augustyn Bańka, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Poland Prof. Dr. Boriss Misnevs, Transport and Telecommunication Institute, Latvia Prof. Dr. Charlotte Nirmalani (Lani) Gunawardena, University of New Mexico, USA Prof. Dr. Christine Howe, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom Prof. Dr. Cevat Celep, Kocaeli University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Cleborne D. Maddux, University of Nevada, USA Prof. Dr. Coşkun Bayrak, Anadolu University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Danièle Moore, Simon Fraser University, Canada Prof. Dr. Gul Nurgalieva, Joint-stock company,"national Center of Information", Kazakhstan Prof. Dr. Emine Demiray, Anadolu University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Erol Yıldız, Alpen-Adria University, Austria Prof. Dr. Esmahan Ağaoğlu, Anadolu University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Francis Glasgow, Guyana University, South America Prof. Dr. Harold Bekkering, University of Nijmegen, Netherlands Prof. Dr. H. Ferhan Odabaşı, Anadolu University, Turkey Prof. Hayriye Koç Başara, Sakarya University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Heli Ruokamo, University of Lapland, Finland Prof. Dr. Jim Flood, Open University, United Kingdom Prof. Dr. Kiyoshi Nakabayashi, Kumamoto University, Japan Prof. Dr. K. M. Gupta, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, India Prof. Dr. Leyla Küçükahmet, Gazi University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Liliana Ezechil, University of Piteşti, Romania Prof. Dr. Marie J. Myers, Queen's University, Canada Prof. Dr. Mehmet Ali Kısakürek, Ankara University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Mehmet Durdu Karslı, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Mehmet Kesim, Anadolu University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Meral Aksu, Middle East Technical University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Min Jou, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan Copyright International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications / www.ijonte.org ii

July 2013 Volume: 4 Issue: 3 ISSN 1309-6249 Prof. Dr. Modafar Ati, Abu Dhabi University, United Arab Emirates Prof. Dr. Mohamed Ziad Hamdan, Modern Education House, Syria Prof. Dr. Müfit Kömleksiz, Cyprus International University,TRNC Prof. Dr. Paul Kawachi, Bejing Normal University, China Prof. Dr. Piet Kommers, University of Twente, Netherlands Prof. Dr. Ramesh C. Sharma, Indira Gandhi National Open University, India Prof. Dr. Richard C. Hunter, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA Prof. Dr. Rozhan M. Idrus, School of Distance Education, University Sains, Malaysia Prof. Dr. Santosh Panda, Indira Gandhi National Open University, India Prof. Dr. Selahattin Gelbal, Hacettepe University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Sharif H. Guseynov, Transport and Telecommunication Institute, Latvia Prof. Dr. Tamar Lominadze, Georgian Technical University, Georgia Prof. Dr. Tanja Betz, Goethe University, Germany Prof. Dr. Tayyip Duman, Gazi University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Tony Townsend, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom Prof. Dr. Valentina Dagiene, Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Lithuania Prof. Dr. Xibin Han, Tsinghua University, China Prof. Dr. Yavuz Akpınar, Bogaziçi University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Yoav Yair,The Open University of Israel, Israel Prof. Dr. Yüksel Kavak, Hacettepe University, Turkey Prof. Dr. Zdena Lustigova, Chareles University, Czech Republic Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet Ok, Middle East Technical University, Turkey Assoc. Prof. Dr. Antonis Lionarakis, Hellenic Open University, Greece Assoc. Prof. Dr. Carlos Machado, Vrije University, Belgium Assoc. Prof. Dr. Danny Bernard Martin, University of Ilinois at Chicago, USA Assoc. Prof. Dr. Demetrios G. Sampson, University of Piraeus, Greece Assoc. Prof. Dr. Gonca Telli Yamamoto, Okan University, Turkey Assoc. Prof. Dr. I. Hakki Mirici, Akdeniz University, Turkey Assoc. Prof. Dr. Natalija Lepkova, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nedim Gürses, Anadolu University, Turkey Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nigel Bagnall, The University of Sydney, Australia Assoc. Prof. Dr. R. E. (Bobby) Harreveld, CQ University, Australia Assoc. Prof. Dr. Rositsa Doneva, Paisii Hilendarski University of Plovdiv, Bulgaria Assoc. Prof. Dr. Shivakumar Deene, Karnataka State Open University, India Assoc. Prof. Dr. Steve Wheeler, University of Plymouth, United Kingdom Assist. Prof. Dr. Irfan Yurdabakan, Dokuz Eykul University, Turkey Assist. Prof. Dr. Katherine Sinitsa, International Research and Training Center, Ukrania Assist. Prof. Dr. Roxana Criu, Cuza University, Romania Dr. Carmencita l. Castolo, Polytechnic University, Philippines Dr. Hisham Mobaideen, Mu'tah University, Jordan Dr. Simon Stobart, University of Teesside, United Kingdom Copyright International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications / www.ijonte.org iii

July 2013 Volume: 4 Issue: 3 Contents ISSN 1309-6249 CONTENTS...iv From The Editors.. vi ARTICLES.....01 01. THE EFFECTS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING METHODS ON STUDENTS ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY LESSONS Ufuk ŞİMŞEK, Bayram YILAR, Birgül KÜÇÜK- TURKEY 01 02. A COMPARATIVE STUDY FOR TEACHING CHEMISTRY THROUGH INDUCTIVE THINKING MODEL AND ADVANCED ORGANIZER MODEL Bhim Chandra MONDAL INDIA.10 03. EFFECT OF A COMPUTER SOFTWARE ON DISABLED SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS ORAL READING FLUENCY Malahat YOUSEFZADEH- IRAN.. 21 04. THE EFFECTS OF MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCE THEORY BASED TEACHING ON STUDENTS ACHIEVEMENT AND RETENTION OF KNOWLEDGE (EXAMPLE OF THE ENZYMES SUBJECT) Sibel GÜRBÜZOĞLU YALMANCI, Ali İbrahim Can GÖZÜM- TURKEY 27 05. GENDER AND EXPERIENCE AS PREDICTOR OF BIOLOGY TEACHERS EDUCATION PROCESS SELF-EFFICACY PERCEPTION AND PERCEPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY FROM STUDENT SUCCESS Murat AKTAŞ, Hakan KURT, Özlem AKSU, Gülay EKİCİ- TURKEY 37 06. THE EFFECT OF GENDER AND COMPUTER USE VARIABLES ON RECOGNATION OF GEOMETRICAL SHAPES IN PRESCHOOL CHILDREN Oğuz Serdar KESİCİOĞLU- TURKEY.48 07. METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS IN SCIENCE CLASSROOM OF HIGHER SECONDARY STUDENTS G. JAYAPRABA- M. KANMANI- INDIA 57 08. E- AND M-LEARNING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY Santosh Kumar BEHERA- INDIA 65 09. ANALYSIS OF OP: 63 PIANO ETUDES BY LUIS STREABBOG WITH REGARDS TO TARGET BEHAVIOURS Yüksel PİRGON- TURKEY 79 10. THE OPINIONS OF THE ACADEMICIONS REGARDING TO PIANO EDUCATION İzzet YÜCETOKER, Özer KUTLUK..87 11. BIOLOGY DEPARTMENT AND SCIENCE EDUCATION STUDENTS ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY, ATTITUDE AND BEHAVIOURS Yusuf KARADEMİR, Murat BARLAS, Çiğdem Aldan KARADEMİR- TURKEY.102 12. PAULO FREIRE S PERCEPTION OF DIALOGUE BASED EDUCATION Abdullah DURAKOĞLU- TURKEY 112 Copyright International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications / www.ijonte.org iv

July 2013 Volume: 4 Issue: 3 Contents ISSN 1309-6249 13. A STUDY ON THE ATTITUDES OF IRANIAN CANDIDATES TOWARDS THE GENERAL IELTS TEST Seyyed Behrooz HOSSEINI, Seyyed Ali HOSSEINI, Alireza ROUDBARI- IRAN.. 108 14. MUSEUM OF SOCIAL STUDIES IN EDUCATION STUDENTS ATTITUDES AND VIEWS Hatice MEMİŞOĞLU, Samet KAMÇI- TURKEY 121 15. GENERAL PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN GENERAL INSPECTIONS OF PRIMARY SCHOOLS ACCORDING TO THE VIEWS OF INSPECTORS AND PRINCIPALS Salih Paşa MEMİŞOĞLU, Zeki EKİNCİ- TURKEY...139 16. THE EFFECT OF STRESS COPING PROGRAM ON BURNOUT LEVELS OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS Gülriz YEDİGÖZ SÖNMEZ- Burhan ÇAPRİ- TURKEY..148 17. EXAMINATION OF LEARNING APPROACH LEVELS IN PIANO COURSES ACCORDING TO SOME VARIABLES IN INDIVIDUAL INSTRUMENT COURSE Mehtap AYDINER UYGUN- TURKEY.165 18. PROSPECTIVE ELEMENTARY TEACHERS MISCONCEPTIONS IN BIOLOGY LESSON: URINARY SYSTEM SAMPLE Murat GENÇ- TURKEY 178 19. AN INVESTIGATION OF GOODNESS OF MODEL DATA FIT: EXAMPLE OF PISA 2009 MATHEMATICS SUBTEST Gülden KAYA UYANIK, Gülşen TAŞDELEN TEKER, Neşe GÜLER TURKEY.188 20. THE IMPORTANCE OF SCHOOL MANAGEMENT HAS BEEN INCREASING IN STUDENT ACADEMIC SUCCESS, BASED ON INTERNATIONAL EXAMS Haydar ATEŞ, Gülbanu ARTUNER TURKEY.197 Copyright International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications / www.ijonte.org v

July 2013 Volume: 4 Issue: 3 From Editors ISSN 1309-6249 Dear IJONTE Readers, International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications- IJONTE appears on your screen now as Volume 4, Number 3. In this issue it publishes 20 articles. And this time, 39 authors from 3 different countries are placed. These are India, Iran and Turkey. Our journal has been published for over four years. It has been followed by many people and a lot of articles have been sent to be published. 182 articles have been sent to referees for forthcoming issues. They will be published according to the order and the results. Articles are sent to referees without names and addresses of the authors. The articles who get positive responses will be published and the authors will be informed. The articles who are not accepted to be published will be returned to their authors. We wish you success and easiness in your studies. Cordially, 1 st July, 2013 Editors Prof. Dr. Zeki KAYA, Gazi University, Ankara, TURKEY Prof. Dr. Ugur DEMIRAY, Anadolu University, Eskisehir, TURKEY Assist. Prof. Dr. Ilknur ISTIFCI, Anadolu University, Eskisehir, TURKEY Copyright International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications / www.ijonte.org vi

PROSPECTIVE ELEMENTARY TEACHERS MISCONCEPTIONS IN BIOLOGY LESSON: URINARY SYSTEM SAMPLE ABSTRACT Asisst. Prof.Dr. Murat GENÇ Bartin University Education Faculty Department of Science Education Bartin, TURKEY The aim of this study was to investigate misconceptions of prospective elementary teachers in biology lesson. The sample of the research consists of 45 prospective teachers in Bartin University Education Faculty. Urinary system which was Biology unit was selected as the research subject. Before the application, the students were asked 5 open-ended questions which were about urinary system. The lessons were treated with computer animations and presentations which were prepared in cooperative learning groups. After the applications open-ended questions were asked to students as a post-test. In the result of the research, it was concluded that the students confused the urinary system with digestive system. It was revealed that students have lots of wrong information about urinary system which was taught in 5 th and 7 th class. They have misconceptions about diseases and organs of urinary system. They said diseases of digestive system instead of urinary system. The findings of the study proved that the most of the misconceptions of the students were removed. Key Words: Misconceptions, Urinary System, Primary School Teaching, Computer Animations, Cooperative Learning. INTRODUCTION Concept is the word, which occurs when living creatures, things and incidents are classified according to their similarities. Individuals make generalization as to common features of the 3 things above and then they compose their concepts according to their other common features. Concepts have differences form individual to individual in terms of their perceived property, so they have subjective property. Because of its subjectiveness, concept mistakes occur. They are difficult to uncover it s because students compose them in their mind and also they are not able to observe directly. Because of the concepts subjective qualities, they cause some complications for teachers and students. Some materials are done in order to decrease these complications. With the help of these activities such as; Meaning resolution table, concept Networks, Conceptual change texts, Concept maps and concept games, it is aimed to teach concept correctly. At the researches, it is recommended to use different methods to teach concepts. Some of these are predict-observe-explain (Bilen and Aydoğdu, 2010), concept maps (Yılmaz and Çolak, 2012), multi-stimulant educational environments (Hayran, 2010), multiple intelligence, (Köksal, 2006), animation, simulation, video and multimedia (Pekdağ, 2010). It is also important to determination of the concept mistakes to correct concept teaching for the desired level. Different methods are used to determine the concept mistakes. Some of these methods are concept maps (Altın and Aslan, 2006; Roth and Roychoughury,1992), ) predict-observe-explain (Köse, Coştu and Keser, 2003), V- diagrams (Nakiboğlu and Arık, 2006), Documan usage (Coştu, Aysal and Ünal, 2007), Concept test (Artun Coştu, 2011; Atasoy and Akdeniz, 2007; Değirmenci, Bacanak and Karamustafaoğlu, 2012; Gülçiçek and Yağbasan, 2004; İsen and Kavcar, 2006; Koray, Özdemir ve Tatar, 2005; Kutluay, 2005), Semi-structured interview forms (Anıl and Küçüközer, 2010), and Games (Genç, Genç and Yüzüak, 2012). 178

At the concept teaching, some different methods are use to establish the concept mistakes. And in order to find solutions to these mistakes, different methods can be used. In order to find solutions to concept mistakes; researchers do some researches such as, predict-observe-explain method (Aydın, 2010), worksheets (Demircioğlu, Demircioğlu and Ayas, 2004), Conceptual change texts (Demirbaş Tanrıverdi, Altınışık and Şahintürk, 2011), and Know-want-learn strategy (Yurd, 2007, Yurd and Olğun, 2008). Thanks to the last differences teaching programme students try to research, direct, arrange the course time and durations and improve the classrooms (Hurd, 2000). It is especially researched how the different methods affect the student success (Genç, 2007; Tosun and Taşkesenligil, 2013). In addition, classrooms are decorated and researches for improving student success are done. (Akyol and Fer, 2010; Güneş, 2005; Kalem and Fer, 2003; Usta and Mahiroğlu, 2008; Yılmaz and Akkoyunlu, 2006). It is also needed to dwell upon the teachers who are important to teach concepts in addition to these researches, teachers who are one of the most important elements of education, are able to be component and assume the program. It is important to make the education effective, teachers needed to do their roles best. (Arslan, 1996; Güven, 2001). Teachers have big roles to students acquire, build and learn the information. Teachers have such an effective roles that the problems they face are handicaps for arriving the aims. For this reason, teacher training is also started to take importance. Teachers are tried to give some various education both university and working periods. During this education, different feedbacks are taken and program corrections are done. Anyway, information about the practices in the courses are taken and recommendations are given. In order to estimate the effect situation of activities especially in the lesson, it is needed to teachers and students points of view (Altunoğlu and Atav, 2005; Kaya and Gürbüz, 2002; Öztürk, 2004; Yeşilyurt and Gül, 2008). In this research paper, the concept mistakes of the teachers in their branches before courses and removal of the problems after the practice are researched. Aim of Study The aim of this study is to define the mistakes of candidate class teachers about the biological concepts. According to this aim, urinary system sample is exampled. METHOD The pattern of the research is pretest and posttest model (Karasar, 2012). At this model, argument model is done and results are compared. Data of the research are gathered via an open-ended questionnaire and commented on. Working Group In this research paper, participants are from biology course of first grade, Bartin University Education Faculty Elementary Teacher Education Department. Total 45 which were 12 male and 33 female prospective teachers participated the study. Participants take part in research for the subject urinary system in biology course in 2012-2013. Data Collection Tool Researcher collect data via a questionnaire form. 5 open-ended questions are asked to the participant. In spite of their deficiency, open-ended questions are preferred because they give chance to participants to say their real thoughts. Except from the researcher, two experts also review the form and they give their recommendations. Practice of the Work Work is done in the urinary system in biology course at first term in Elementary Teacher Education class. 5 open-ended questions are asked to the participant before the practice. This subject is run twice at the 5 th and 179

7 th grades. The subject is run for two weeks. For the cooperation group -5 students- research urinary, urinary organs, urinary products, urinary system illnesses and urinary system health. They use animations. FINDINGS 5 open-ended are asked to the candidate teachers in order to get information. Before and after practice answers are at the table. Table 1: Why human body needs urinary? Pretest, posttest distribution. Pretest distribution. Posttest distribution. To be thrown the useless products 27 38 To continuation of life 15 35 To save the body health 12 37 To save the body balance 9 41 To work the systems regularly 5 26 To health of inside 1 15 For the Table 1, pretest answers are dominant to be thrown the useless products. The interviews with the students show that they give this answer but they do not know the exact meaning of urinary. For example, student 2 (S2) said that:. Urinary means excrete something. That is to say, our body excretes something so we say urinary. It excretes harmful things. Similarly, (S4).. I don t know the whole definition but I think urinary means to throw. Waste from what we eat shouldn t stay in the body. They are waste anymore. After the practice, students say that urinary should be done in order to save the body health and balance, continuation of life and also throw the harmful waste. (S3) while we are going our life, some extra products occur at the end of the metabolic activities of the body. They are harmful for the health and the balance of the body. For this reason they should be thrown out of the body. That s why disposal through urine is done (S4). As I guess, this is done to protect the balance and health of the body. Actually beforehand I supposed that the throwing digestion product was urinary. But the point was different. Table 2: Which organs are there in the Urinary System? Pretest, posttest distribution. Pretest distribution. Posttest distribution. Kidney 43 45 Intestines 37 10 Sudoriferous glands 9 0 Urine bag 7 42 Urinary tract organ 4 38 Urinary channel 3 11 Gallbladder 3 0 Liver 2 26 Skin 1 32 Ureter 0 43 Urethra 0 42 Lung 2 34 Anus 0 36 180

When we look at Table 2, we see that students give very different examples about the urinary system. Urinary tract organs like Sudoriferous glands, Gallbladder and Intestines are not able to exist, so the other helping organs are liver, skin and lungs. S6 I thought and write lung and skin as urinary tract organ. They also throw something out of the body. But they were the kidneys doing the real job. S5 said that first of all I thought that our meals are just the urinary substance. However I thought that Intestines are urinary tract organ, too. But I didn t think excreting substances through cells. It is defined that students wrote both urinary tract organs and urinary system after the practice. They talked generally in their speech about urinary tract organs and helping organs. Anyway, they declared which organs excrete which urinary substance. Table 3: Which substance can be thrown out of the body through urinary system? Pretest, posttest distribution. Pretest distribution. Posttest distribution. Harmful substances 17 36 Excess and waste substances 16 42 Urea and uric acid 16 36 Water 9 42 Salt 8 25 Ammonia 14 3 Carbohydrate 3 0 Sweat 1 15 Urine 1 38 Glucose 0 5 Vitamin 0 5 Mineral salts 0 16 Carbon dioxide 0 22 Amino-acid 0 5 When Table 3 is examined, it takes attention that urinary substance is very much. Before the practice, students said that the substances after the digestion are urinary substance and they are harmful, much and waste for the body. The ones who said Ammonia is thrown as a urinary substance changed their sayings and said I didn t know that Ammonia is less harmful for the liver.. Vitamin, Amino-acid and Glucose shouldn t be in a healthy human s urine but it can be excrete from an unhealthy human s urine. It is because they are urinary system substance. S34 said that.anyway the Glucose can be seen in the urine of the human who are diabetes, has vitamins and eats fruit.. Most of the student speeches show us that they said urinary substance such as urea, uric acid and ammonia which include harmful and waste substance are thrown out of the body through urinary. Students sometimes said the general names of the substances or they talked about their contents. For instance, some students said for the sweat that salt and water. Table 4: Write Urinary System Diseases. Pretest, posttest distribution. Pretest distribution Posttest distribution Diarrhea 28 5 Constipation 28 5 Prostate 10 29 Urinary tract diseases 7 32 Kidney stone 5 45 181

Intestines cancer 17 2 Hemorrhoid 14 2 Renal failure 3 36 Kidney diseases 5 26 Pancreatic cancer 3 0 Diabetes 0 3 Cystitis 0 35 Albumin 0 36 Reproductive 0 42 Nephritis 0 43 Ulcer 9 2 When we examine Table 4, students said urinary system diseases to their digestion system diseases such as Diarrhea, Constipation, Hemorrhoid and Renal failure before the practice. After the practice, less student write urinary system diseases for this kind of diseases. Therefore the diseases such as cystitis, reproductive and nephritis aren t known before the practice but they are talked about after the practice. Table 5. What should or shouldn t be done for the health of Urinary system? Pretest, Posttest distribution. Pretest distribution. Posttest distribution. Consume water 40 45 Healthy nutrition 12 44 Balanced nutrition 8 44 Attention to cleaning 10 36 Regular urinary 5 29 Not eating hot, acidic and salty 6 39 Warm feet 16 2 Chew well 13 0 Consume fruit and vegetable 3 14 Do regular sports 1 25 Having shower regularly 0 15 Attention to mouth and teeth 0 39 Using regular pills and completing the cure 0 26 Saving kidneys from cold 0 22 Cure of throat inflammation 0 12 Not holding the urea 0 38 When we look at Table 5, we see that recommended substances which are needed to health of urine system are increase after the practice. Before the practice, participant wrote usual recommendations about the health. S5 wrote that doctors recommend drinking more water, balanced nutrition do not swallow the food without chewing well. So I wrote these thanks to doctors recommendations. I did not know how much these affect the urinary system. But now I know the urinary system and my recommendations are fit with it. These are common healthy rules we can see this. After the practice, recommendations are focused on urinary system health. S2 declared that I especially learned what we should do to protect ourselves after I learned the diseases. This kind of diseases decreases the life standards of human. We should be careful. And S4 explained that my animation was related to urinary system health. For this reason, I remember all these 182

recommendations. Anyway I presented my subject in the classroom effectively; hence my friends also remembered them too. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION It is aimed to define mistakes of participants about biology in this research which is done with candidate class teachers. Also it is expected from candidate teachers to know the basic subjects of most sources because they are in the curriculum. Teachers are expected to acquire basic level Maths, Sciences, Social Science, etc. Teachers use this branch information to direct students and presentation of subjects. They present their knowledge to students through pedagogic formation. The mistakes occur in the presentation of the knowledge affect the student s life. It is expected that concept mistakes at the biology subjects will be more in the future. It is because that biology as a branch of Sciences is taught incorrectly or students shouldn t be internalized correctly. In the research, the candidate class teachers mistakes about the urinary system which is one of the systems in the human body, are defined. It is appeared that participants confuse this system with especially digestion system, they do not know the urinary system diseases and they do not know what should be done. Also it is seen that the participants who are taught to teach this subject, forget what they learned. Urinary system is at the 5th and 7th grade curriculum. The participants gave answers thinking the concept urinary. Their answers about urinary system organs, urinary substances and urinary system diseases show that they have wrong manners for so common daily life issues. Various ways are used to correct the concept mistakes. Courses were done with computer animations and presentations through collaborative learning groups. Students prepared suitable animations about the topic and presented in the classrooms. The question and answer part at the end of the course helped the students to understand the topic. Constructive learning is used in our country and this helps candidate teachers to learn these other methods. It is defined that the concept mistakes seen at the teachers are also seen at the students (Barrass, 1984). At this condition, in order to prevent concept mistake of students, the mistakes of the teacher who will educate them should be determined. There are various recommendations for more effective concept teaching. Pekdağ (2010) recommends information and communication technology in order to increase the effectiveness of concept teaching. Eraslan (2009) declared after examining the Finland sample which is successful in the competition that teacher training needs much more importance. It is also recommended that teacher training programs should be improved in terms of teaching team and substructure, teachers should renew themselves with the help of universities and in-service course should be organized, also schools should be decorated, successful teachers should be rewarded. IJONTE s Note: This article was presented at 4 th International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications - ICONTE, 25-27 April, 2013, Antalya-Turkey and was selected for publication for Volume 4 Number 3 of IJONTE 2013 by IJONTE Scientific Committee. 183

BIODATA AND CONTACT ADDRESSES OF AUTHOR Murat GENÇ, currently employed as an Assistant Professor at Bartin University Education Faculty, Department of Science Education. He received Phd degree in Science Education at Marmara University. His research interests include science education, cooperative learning, Information and Communication Technologies, environmental education, Project-Based Learning. Assist. Prof. Dr. Murat GENÇ Bartin University Education Faculty Department of science Education Bartin-TURKEY E. Mail: muratgenc77@gmail.com REFERENCES Akyol, S. & Fer, S. (2010). Sosyal yapılandırmacı öğrenme ortamı tasarımının öğrenenlerin akademik başarılarına ve öğrenmenin kalıcılığına etkisi nedir?, International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 11-13 November, 2010 Antalya-Turkey. Altın, K. ve Aslan, M. (2006). Kavram haritalarının fizik dersinde kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesinde kullanılması, Yedi Tepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi EDU7, Cilt 1, sayı, 2. Altunoğlu, B. D. & Atav, E. (2005). Daha etkili bir biyoloji öğretimi için öğretmen beklentileri, [Teacher expectations for a more efficient biology instruction], Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28: 19-28. Anıl, Ö. & Küçüközer, H. (2010). Ortaöğretim 9. sınıf öğrencilerinin düzlem ayna konusunda sahip oldukları ön bilgi ve kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesi, Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(3), 104-122. Arslan, M. (1996). Türkiye de öğretmen yetiştirme konusunda yeni arayışlar, Modern Öğretmen Yetiştirmede Gelişme ve İlerlemeler Sempozyumu, 328-334. Artun, H. & Coştu, B. (2011). Sınıf öğretmen adaylarının difüzyon ve osmoz kavramları ile ilgili yanılgılarının belirlenmesi, Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, Yıl 8, Sayı 4, 117-127. Atasoy, Ş. & Akdeniz, A.R. (2007). Newton un hareket kanunları konusunda kavram yanılgılarını belirlemeye yönelik bir testin geliştirilmesi ve uygulanması, Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi Yıl 4, Sayı 1, 45-59. Aydın, M. (2010). Fen ve teknoloji öğretiminde tahmin-gözlem-açıklama tekniğinin kullanımının kavram yanılgılarının giderilmesine ve öğrenci başarısına etkisinin araştırılması, Yayınlanmamış yüksek Lisans Tezi, Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Zonguldak. Barrass, R. (1984). Some misconceptions and misunderstandings perpetuated by teachers and textbooks of biology, Journal of Biological Education, 18, 201-206. 184

Bilen, K. & Aydoğdu, M. (2010). Bitkilerde fotosentez ve solunum kavramlarının öğretiminde TGA (tahmin etgözle-açıkla) stratejisinin kullanımı, [Using the predict-observe-explain (POE) strategy to teach of concepts photosynthesis and respiration in plants], Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt/Volume: 7, Sayı/Issue: 14, s. 179-194 Coştu, B., Ayas, A. & Ünal, S. (2007) Kavram yanılgıları ve olası nedenleri: Kaynama kavramı, [Misconceptions about boiling and their possible reasons], Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi Cilt:15 No:1 123-136. Değirmenci, S., Bacanak, A. & Karamustafaoğlu, O.(2012). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının ışık konusundaki kavram yanılgıları, X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, İzmir, 2012. Demirbaş, M, Tanrıverdi, G., Altınışık, D. & Şahintürk, Y.(2011). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının çözeltiler konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının giderilmesinde kavramsal değişim metinlerinin etkisi, [The impact of conceptual change texts on the elimination of misconceptions of science teacher candidates about the subject of solutions], Sakarya University Journal of Education. Vol 1 (2), 52-69 Demircioğlu, H., Demircioğlu, G. & Ayas, A. (2004). Kavram yanılgılarının çalışma yapraklarıyla giderilmesine yönelik bir çalışma, Milli Eğitim Dergisi, Sayı 163 Yaz 2004. Eraslan, A. (2009). Finlandiya nın PISA daki başarısının nedenleri: Türkiye için alınacak dersler, [Reasons behind the success of Finland in PISA: Lessons for Turkey], Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (EFMED) Cilt 3, Sayı 2, 238-248. Gemici, Ö. (2008). Fen ve teknoloji eğitiminde kavram öğretimi, Ed. Ö. Taşkın, Fen ve teknoloji öğretiminde yeni yaklaşımlar (125-147), Ankara: Pegem Akademi. Genç, M. (2007). İşbirlikli öğrenmenin problem çözmeye ve başarıya etkisi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul. Genç, M., Genç, T. & Yüzüak, A.V. (2012). Determination of misconceptions by games: Taboo game. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9, (20), 581-591 Gülçiçek, Ç. & Yağbasan, R. (2004). Basit sarkaç sisteminde mekanik enerjinin korunumu konusunda öğrencilerin kavram yanılgıları, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(3), 23-38. Güneş, G. (2005). Oluşturmacı yaklaşıma göre tasarlanan öğrenme ortamının matematik başarısına etkisi [The effects of learning environment designed by constructivist approach on success in mathematics], Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 25, Sayı 1, 105-121. Güven, İ. (2001). Öğretmen yetiştirmenin uluslararası boyutu (Unesco 45. Uluslararası Eğitim Kongresi), Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 150. Hayran, Z. (2010). Çok uyaranlı eğitim ortamlarının öğrencilerin kavram gelişimine etkisi, [The impact of multi stimuli educational environment on concept development of students], Eğitim ve Bilim, (Education and Science), 2010, Cilt 35, Sayı 158. Hurd, P. D. (2000). Science education for the 21st century, School Science and Mathematics, 6, 282-289. İsen, İ.A. & Kavcar, N. (2006). Ortaöğretim fizik dersi "Yeryüzünde hareket" ünitesindeki kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesi ve ünitenin öğretim programının geliştirilmesi üzerine bir çalışma, Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı 20: 84-90. 185

Kalem, S. & Fer, S. (2003). Aktif öğrenme modeliyle oluşturulan öğrenme ortamının öğrenme, öğretme ve iletişim sürecine etkisi, [The Effects of Active Learning Model on the Learning, Teaching and Communication Process of Students], Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri (Educational Sciences Theory & Practise), 3 (2), 433-461. Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi, 23. Baskı, Ankara: Nobel Yayınları. Kaya, E. & Gürbüz, H. (2002). Lise ve meslek lisesi öğrencilerinin biyoloji öğretiminin sorunlarına ilişkin görüşleri, [The views of the high schools and vocational high schools students on the problems of biology teaching], Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt:4, Sayı:2. Koray, Ö., Özdemir, M. & Tatar, N. (2005). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin Birimler hakkında sahip oldukları kavram yanılgıları: Kütle ve ağırlık örneği, İlköğretim-Online, 4(2), 24-31. Köksal, M.S. (2006). Kavram öğretimi ve çoklu zekâ teorisi, [Concept teaching and multiple intelligences theory], Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi Cilt:14 No:2, 473-480. Köse, S., Coştu, B. & Keser, Ö.F. (2003). Fen konularındaki kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesi: TGA yöntemi ve örnek etkinlikler, [Determination of students misconceptions in Science: Activities through POE method], Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Yıl:2003 (1) Sayı:13, 43-53. Kutluay Y. (2005). 11. Sınıf öğrencilerinin geometrik optik hakkındaki kavram yanılgılarını ölçen üç-aşamalı test geliştirme, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, ODTÜ Ortaöğretim Fen ve Matematik Alanları Eğitimi Bölümü, Ankara. Nakiboğlu, C. & Arık, R. Ö. (2006). 4. Sınıf öğrencilerinin Gazlar ile ilgili kavram yanılgılarının V-diyagramı kullanılarak belirlenmesi, Yedi Tepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi EDU7, Cilt 1, sayı, 2. Öztürk, Ç. (2004). Ortaöğretim coğrafya öğretmenlerinin öğretim yöntem ve teknikleri kullanabilme yeterlilikleri [Secondary school geography teachers ability of using teaching methods and techniques] Gazi Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi, Cilt 5, Sayı: 2, 75-83. Pekdağ, B. (2010). Kimya öğreniminde alternatif yollar: Animasyon, simülasyon, video ve multimedya ile öğrenme, Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(2), 79-110. Roth, W.M. & Roychoughury, A. (1992). The Social of struction of scientific concept or the concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science, Science Education; 76(5), 531-557. Tosun, C. & Taşkesenligil, Y. (2013). The effect of problem-based learning on undergraduate students learning about solutions and their physical properties and scientific processing skills, Chem.Educ.Res.Pract., 2013, 14, 36-50. Usta, E. & Mahiroğlu, A. (2008). Harmanlanmış öğrenme ve çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarının akademik başarı ve doyuma etkisi, [The effects of blended learning and online learning on academic achievement and learner satisfaction], Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD) Cilt 9, Sayı 2, (2008), (1-15) Yeşilyurt, S. & Gül, Ş. (2008). Ortaöğretimde daha etkili bir biyoloji öğretimi için öğretmen ve öğrenci beklentileri, [The expectations of biology teachers and students for a more efficient biology instruction in the secondary schools], Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt:16 No:1, 145-162. Yılmaz, K. & Çolak, R. (2012). Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde kavram haritaları kullanımının öğrencilerin tutum, akademik başarı ve bilgilerinin kalıcılık düzeylerine etkisi, Uluslararası Cumhuriyet Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt 1 / Sayı 1 / Mart 2012. 186

Yılmaz, M. & Akkoyunlu, B. (2006). Farklı öğrenme ortamlarının kalıcılığa etkisi, [The effect of different learning environments on retention], Eurasian Journal Of Educational Research, 23, 209-218. Yurd, M. (2007). İlköğretim 5. sınıf fen ve teknoloji dersinde probleme dayalı öğrenme yöntemi ile bil-iste-öğren stratejisi kullanılarak geliştirilen bil-iste-örnekle-öğren stratejisinin öğrencilerin kavram yanılgılarının giderilmesine ve derse karşı tutumlarına etkisi, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Hatay. Yurd, M. & Olğun, Ö.S. (2008). Probleme dayalı öğrenme ve bil-iste-öğren stratejisinin kavram yanılgılarının giderilmesine etkisi [Effect of problem based learning and know-want-learn strategy to remove misconceptions], Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education) 35, 386-396. 187