The Effect of Teacher Training Programs on Pre-service Mathematics Teachers Beliefs towards Mathematics *

Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 14(2) 804-809 2014 Educational Consultancy and Research Center www.edam.com.tr/estp DOI: 10.12738/estp.2014.2.1787 The Effect of Teacher Training Programs on Pre-service Mathematics Teachers Beliefs towards Mathematics * Yüksel DEDE a Gazi University Fatih KARAKUŞ b Afyon Kocatepe University Abstract The aim of this study was to determine the effects of teacher training programs on pre-service mathematics teachers beliefs about mathematics. The sample of the study consisted of 173 pre-service mathematics teachers from an education faculty in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey. The data were obtained from an open-ended questionnaire, categorized in terms of content analysis and analyzed quantitatively. The results of the study showed that there was no statistical difference between both elementary and secondary pre-service mathematics teachers beliefs from when they started the teaching program to when they graduated from the programs. Yet, the mean scores about mathematical beliefs in the senior class were higher than those of the freshman class. Key Words Beliefs towards Mathematics, Change in Beliefs, Effect of Training Program, Pre-service Mathematics Teacher, Teacher Training Program. Mathematics education reforms in the world also have affected the Turkish mathematics education system, moving from traditional approaches to content-based approaches based on problem solving (Baki, 2008). In accordance with the 2005 teaching program reforms in Turkey, a constructivist approach was adapted. Teachers roles changed from traditional to guidance within the curriculum (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, 2005). Conducting a successful curriculum mostly depends on the teachers (Çakıroğlu & Çakıroğlu, 2003). In many researches it was found that teachers and pre-service teachers attended these reforms, but they did not reflect the approaches focused on in these reforms into their teaching (e.g. Gooya, 2007; Gregoire, 1999; Hiebert & Stigler, 2000; Toluk- Uçar & Demirsoy, 2010). However, it is frequently mentioned in the literature that teachers beliefs and teachers perspectives effect their behavior and attitude during their teaching period (e.g. Hacıömeroğlu, 2011; Kayan & Çakıroğlu, 2008; Pajares, 1992; Raymond, 1997; Thompson, 1984; Toluk-Uçar & Demirsoy, 2010; Toluk-Uçar, Pişkin, Akkaş, & Taşçı, 2010;). In this context, it is very important to examine the change in teachers and pre-service teachers beliefs. * A part of this study was presented as an oral presentation at the X. Ulusal Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi in Nigde (June 27-30, 2012). a Yüksel DEDE, Ph.D., is currently a professor of mathematics education. His research interests include mathematics education, affective behaviors in mathematics education (especially teaching and learning values) and teacher education. Correspondence: Gazi University, Gazi Faculty of Education, Department of Mathematics Education, 06500, Teknikokullar, Ankara, Turkey. Email: ydede2000@gmail.com b Fatih KARAKUŞ, Ph.D., is an assistant professor of mathematics education. Contact: Afyon Kocatepe University, Faculty of Education, Department of Mathematics Education, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. Email: fkarakus@aku.edu.tr

DEDE, KARAKUŞ / The Effect of Teacher Training Programs on Pre-service Mathematics Teachers Beliefs towards Mathematics In the literature it is stated that there is not any agreement on the definition of beliefs (Ernest, 1989; Pajares, 1992; Thompson, 1992). Schoenfeld (1985) and Sigel (1985) focused on the fact that belief occurs relative to one s experiences thus focusing on its cognitive dimension. Furinghetti and Pehkonen (2002) and Richardson (2003) focused on the affective dimension of belief. Ernest (1989) defines belief towards mathematics as an individual s comprehension values, ideology and tendency towards mathematics. He classified belief towards mathematics as instrumental, Platonist and problem solving. Dionne (1984), on the other hand, classified belief towards mathematics as traditional, formalist and constructivist. Törner and Grigutsch (1994) stated that mathematical belief has three components: toolbox, system and process. These different views are more or less related to each other (Liljedahl, 2009). Ernest emphasized mathematics teachers beliefs in three subcontexts: beliefs about the nature of mathematics, beliefs about the teaching of mathematics and beliefs about the learning of mathematics. Beliefs about the nature of mathematics deal with what mathematics is used for and what its qualifications are. Beliefs about the teaching of mathematics deal with how teaching is expected to be done and which materials and methods are going to be used during teaching. Beliefs about the learning of mathematics deal with the beliefs of teachers on how they conceive of the learning of mathematics and which activities are appropriate for them (Baydar & Bulut, 2002; Ernest, 1989). Feiman-Nemser, McDiarmid, Melnick, and Parker s (1988) studies were in accordance with Ernest s study towards describing this classification. Philippou and Christou (1999) and Steinbring (1998) stated that teachers beliefs effect their teaching period as well as their classroom activities. Teachers beliefs towards mathematics can be formed in two ways: a) the studies examining the relationship between teachers beliefs and their teaching practices regarding mathematics (e.g. Beswick, 2006; Hart, 2002; Raymond, 1997; Thompson, 1984) and b) the studies defining teachers beliefs about the nature of mathematics, the teaching of mathematics and the learning of mathematics (e.g. Adnan & Zakaria, 2010; Paksu, 2008; Shahvarani & Savizi, 2007). Since most of our beliefs are resistant to change, being formed in childhood and during the experiences of school life (Frank, 1988), studies examining the change in teachers beliefs show that teachers are extremely resistant towards changing their current beliefs (Hiebert & Stigler, 2000). It is clear that the studies about the effects of teacher education programs on pre-service teachers beliefs show two different results. The first is that they have little impact on teachers beliefs (e.g. Lortie, 1975; Prawat, 1992; Raymond, 1997; Weinstein, 1989). The other is that teacher education programs have an impact on pre-service teachers beliefs (Hart, 2002; Wilkins & Brand, 2004). In Turkey, when studies about teachers and pre-service teachers beliefs about mathematics were examined, they generally focused on beliefs about self-efficacy (Dede, 2008; Doruk & Kaplan, 2012) and problem solving (Hacıömeroğlu, 2011; Kayan & Çakıroğlu, 2008). However, in recent years, there are a few studies focusing on pre-service teachers beliefs and anxieties regarding mathematics (e.g. Hacıömeroğlu, 2013), beliefs about mathematics and teaching practices (e.g. Toluk-Uçar & Demirsoy, 2010), and beliefs about the nature, teaching and learning of mathematics (e.g. Kayan, Haser, & Bostan Işıksal, 2013). Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of the teacher education program on elementary and secondary school pre-service teachers beliefs about the nature, teaching and learning of mathematics. Method The descriptive method was used in this study. In descriptive studies, a given situation is carefully described as completely as possible (Büyüköztürk, Çakmak, Kılıç, Özcan, Karadeniz, & Demirel, 2011). The purpose of such research is to define what an event is and describe its components in order to interpret, compare, classify and analyze (Cohen, Manion, & Marrison, 2007). Sample The sample under investigation was comprised of 173 pre-service teachers from a university in the Anatolian region of Turkey. 91 pre-service teachers were from the department of elementary mathematics education and the other 82 were from the department of secondary mathematics education in the same education faculty. Data Collection Instrument Data was collected from the six open-ended questions prepared within the interview questions used in the Banks (2005) and Bütün (2005) studies about 805

EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES: THEORY & PRACTICE teacher and pre-service teachers beliefs regarding mathematics. Among the open-ended questions, two questions, If your friends ask you what is mathematics, what would you answer? and What is the source of mathematical knowledge? were about the nature of mathematics. Two other questions, What do you think is the best way to learn mathematics? and what do you do when you encounter difficulty in learning a mathematical concept or topic? were about the learning of mathematics. The last two questions, What is the most effective way to learn mathematics? and What do you do when faced with teaching a mathematical topic that you don t exactly understand? were about the teaching of mathematics. Data Analysis There are some studies which use quantitative analysis methods while analyzing qualitative data (e.g. Abeyasekera, 2005; Bernard, 1996; Winch & More, 1956; Young, 1981). In this study qualitative data was analyzed by using the quantitative method. In this context, content analysis was used to analyze the data. The main aim of content analysis is to show concepts and relationships that can explain the collected data (Miles & Huberman, 1994; Tavşancıl & Aslan, 2001). Firstly, research helps determine the general categories and sub-categories. In this study, three general categories were identified: traditional beliefs, transmission beliefs and nontraditional beliefs, according to the Ernest (1989), Raymond (1997) and Toluk-Uçar and Demirsoy s (2010) studies. After examining the beliefs based on these three different categories, statistics was used to determine the effect of the teacher education program on the pre-service teachers beliefs. One point for those with traditional beliefs, two points for those with transmission beliefs, and three points for those with non-traditional beliefs were assessed. Finally, if the score for one pre-service teacher s beliefs about mathematics came near to nine, he/she was considered to have non-traditional beliefs. In this way, qualitative data was converted to quantitative data, and using Tekin s (1996) study this data was scored. To determine if there was a significant effect from the teacher education program on the pre-service teachers beliefs about mathematics, descriptive statistics and a t-test were used. Moreover, eta-squared values were calculated in order to examine the effect of any meaningful difference between groups (Cohen, 1988). Reliability of Study In this study a theoretical triangulation was done (Cohen et al., 2000) according to the categories prepared using the Ernest (1989), Raymond (1997), and Toluk-Uçar and Demirsoy s (2010) studies. Pre-service teachers views were evaluated under these categories. In this stage, no change was made to the words used by the pre-service teachers and the written text was shown to them for their approval. Hence, reliability of the data was acquired (Creswell, 1998). Additionally, a peer review was used in order to confirm the data as reliable (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). Results and Discussions Both elementary and secondary school pre-service teachers had traditional beliefs about mathematics when they began the teacher education program. Parallel to this research, Kagan (1992), Haser (2006) and Demirsoy (2008) indicated that pre-service teachers began the teacher education program with traditional beliefs. Moreover, both elementary and secondary school pre-service teachers held their traditional beliefs about mathematics when they graduated from the program. However, Kayan et al. (2013) found that primary pre-service mathematics teachers had more constructivist beliefs about mathematics. This shows that the teacher education program had different effects on pre-service teachers beliefs. Yet, senior class pre-service teachers in both programs had higher beliefs on average then the freshman pre-service teachers from both programs. Thus, the teacher education programs effected the pre-service teachers beliefs, but they were not enough for changing them. Vacc and Bright (1999), Wilkins and Brand (2004), Işıkoğlu (2008), and Haser and Doğan (2012) stated that some courses such as subject area teaching methods, and one s experience in the teacher education program had an effect on changing pre-service teachers beliefs. Both elementary and secondary school pre-service teachers had traditional beliefs about the learning of mathematics when they began the teacher education program. When they graduated, however, the elementary school pre-service teachers had transmission belief scores about the learning of mathematics, but secondary school pre-service teachers held their traditional belief scores. That is, elementary school pre-service teachers belief scores were higher than secondary school pre-service teachers belief scores in regard to the learning of mathematics. The reasons for this could be the teaching methods as well as the secondary school teachers 806

DEDE, KARAKUŞ / The Effect of Teacher Training Programs on Pre-service Mathematics Teachers Beliefs towards Mathematics education program having more theoretical courses than the primary school education program. The results of the pre-service teachers beliefs about the nature, teaching and learning of mathematics are as follows: a) Both elementary and secondary school preservice teachers had traditional beliefs about the nature of mathematics when they began the teacher education program. But, secondary school pre-service teachers had higher belief scores. When they graduated, both elementary and secondary school pre-service teachers also had traditional beliefs about the nature of mathematics. b) Both elementary and secondary school preservice teachers had traditional beliefs about the teaching of mathematics when they began the teacher education program. Although beliefs leaned towards transmission beliefs, both elementary and secondary school pre-service teachers had traditional beliefs about the teaching of mathematics when they graduated. c) Both elementary and secondary school preservice teachers had traditional beliefs about the learning of mathematics when they began the teacher education program. When they graduated, the elementary school pre-service teachers had transmission beliefs scores about the learning of mathematics, but secondary school pre-service teachers had traditional beliefs scores. That is, elementary school pre-service teachers beliefs scores are higher than secondary school pre-service teachers beliefs scores about the learning of mathematics. The results of the pre-service teachers beliefs about mathematics in terms of grade levels are follows: a) In terms of grade levels, there was no statistical difference between freshman pre-service elementary school mathematics teachers and senior preservice elementary school mathematics teachers beliefs about the nature of mathematics, but there were differences between them according to their beliefs about mathematics, the teaching of mathematics, and the learning of mathematics. b) In terms of grade levels, there was no statistical difference between freshman pre-service secondary school mathematics teachers and senior pre-service secondary school mathematics teachers beliefs about the nature of mathematics, but there were differences between them according to their beliefs about mathematics, the teaching of mathematics, and the learning of mathematics. c) In terms of the teacher education program there was no statistical difference between freshman elementary school and freshman secondary school pre-service mathematics teachers beliefs about mathematics, the nature of mathematics, and the teaching and learning of mathematics. When they graduated, there was no statistical difference between senior elementary and senior secondary school pre-service mathematics teachers beliefs about mathematics, the nature of mathematics, and the teaching of mathematics. Yet, it was determined that there was a significant difference between them regarding their beliefs about learning mathematics in favor of the elementary school pre-service teachers. 807

EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES: THEORY & PRACTICE References/Kaynakça Abeyasekera, S. (2005). Quantitative analysis approaches to qualitative data: why, when and how? In J. D. Holland & J. Campbell (Eds.), Methods in development research; combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 97-106). Warwickshire: ITDG Publishing. Adnan, M., & Zakaria, E. (2010). Exploring beliefs of preservice mathematics teachers: A Malaysian perspective. Asian Social Science, 6(10), 152-159. Baki, A. (2008). Kuramdan uygulamaya matematik eğitimi. Ankara: Harf Eğitim Yayıncılık. Banks, C. C-L. (2005). Pre-service teachers personal epistemological beliefs in relation to their beliefs in national council of teachers of mathematics principles and standards for school mathematics (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3183571) Baydar, S. C. ve Bulut, S. (2002). Öğretmenlerin matematiğin doğası ve öğretimi ile ilgili inançların matematik eğitimindeki önemi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 62-66. Bernard, H. R. (1996). Qualitative data, quantitative analysis. The Cultural Anthropology Methods Journal, 8(1), 9-11. Beswick, K. (2006). Changes in preservice teachers attitudes and beliefs: The net impact of two mathematics education units and intervening experiences. School Science and Mathematics, 106(1), 36-47. Bütün, M. (2005). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenlerinin alan eğitimi bilgilerinin nitelikleri üzerine bir çalışma (Yüksek lisans tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı, Trabzon). http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/ adresinden edinilmiştir. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. Kılıç, A., Özcan, E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2011). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları. Çakıroğlu, E., & Çakıroğlu, J. (2003). Reflections on teacher education in Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(2), 253-264. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Dede, Y. (2008). Matematik öğretmenlerinin öğretimlerine yönelik öz-yeterlik inançları. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(4), 741-757. Demirsoy, N.H. (2008). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenlerinin matematik hakkındaki inançları, uygulamaları ve arasındaki ilişki (Yüksek lisans tezi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bolu). http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/ adresinden edinilmiştir. Dionne, J. J. (1984). The perception of mathematics among elementary school teachers. In J. M. Moser (Ed.), Proc. 6th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Int. Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 223-228). Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin: PME-NA. Doruk, M. ve Kaplan, A. (2012). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının matematik öğretimine yönelik öz-yeterlik inançlarının incelenmesi. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 5(7), 291-302. Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15, 13-33. Feiman-Nemser, S., McDiarmid, G. W., Melnick, S., & Parker, M. (1988). Changing beginning teachers conceptions: A study of an introductory teacher education course. East Lansing: National Center for Research on Teacher Education and Department of Teacher Education, Michigan State University. Frank, M. L. (1988). Problem solving and mathematical beliefs. Arithmetic Teacher, 35(5), 32-34. Furinghetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterizations of belief. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Toerner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 39-58). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Gooya, Z. (2007). Mathematics teachers beliefs about a new reform in high school geometry in Iran. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65, 331-347. Gregoire, M. (1999, April). Paradoxes and paradigms in an eighth grade pre-algebra class: A case study of a Good math teacher. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada. Hacıömeroğlu, G. (2011). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının matematiksel problem çözmeye ilişkin inançlarını yordama epistemolojik inançlarının incelenmesi. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 206-220. Hacıömeroğlu, G. (2013). Mathematics anxiety and mathematics beliefs: What is the relationship in elementary pre-service teachers? IUMPST, 5, 1-9. Retrieved from http://www.k-12prep. math.ttu.edu/journal/attributes/ haciomeroglu02/article.pdf Hart, L. (2002). Preservice teachers beliefs and practice after participating in an integrated content/methods courses. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 4-14. Haser, C. (2006). Investigation of preservice and inservice teachers mathematics related beliefs in Turkey and the perceived effect of middle school mathematics education program and the school contexts on these beliefs. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3236322) Haser, Ç., & Doğan, O. (2012). Preservice mathematics teachers belief systems. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38, 261-274. Hiebert, J., & Stigler, J. (2000). A proposal for improving classroom teaching: Lessons from the TIMSS video study. The Elementary School Journal, 101(1), 3-20. Işıkoğlu, N. (2008). The effect of a teaching methods course on early childhood pre-service teachers beliefs. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 29(3), 190-203. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90. Kayan, F. ve Çakıroğlu, E. (2008). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel problem çözmeye yönelik inançları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 218-226. Kayan, R., Haser, Ç. ve Bostan Işıksal, M. (2013). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematiğin doğası, öğretimi ve öğrenimi hakkındaki inanışları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(167), 179-195. Liljedahl, P. (2009). Teachers insights into the relationship between beliefs and practice. In J. Maab & W. Schlöglmann (Eds.), Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education new research results (pp. 33-43). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newburry Park, CA: Sage. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. London: University of Chicago Press. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2005). Ortaöğretim matematik (9, 10, 11 ve 12. Sınıflar) dersi öğretim programı. www.ttkb.gov.tr adresinden edinilmiştir. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-333. Paksu, A. D. (2008). Öğretmenlerin matematik hakkındaki inançlarının branş ve cinsiyet bakımından karşılaştırılması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 87-97. Philippou, G., & Christou, C. (1999, September). Efficacy beliefs with respect to mathematics teaching. Paper presented at the Mathematical Beliefs and their Impact on Teaching and Learning of Mathematics Conference at Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach, Germany. 808

DEDE, KARAKUŞ / The Effect of Teacher Training Programs on Pre-service Mathematics Teachers Beliefs towards Mathematics Prawat, R. S. (1992). Teachers beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education, 100(3), 354-395. Raymond, A. M. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher s mathematics beliefs and teaching practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 550-576. Richardson, V. (2003). Preservice teachers beliefs. In J. Rath & A. C. McAninch (Eds.), Advances in teacher education series, (pp. 1-22). Greenwich, CT: Information Age. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press. Shahvarani, A., & Savizi, B. (2007). Analyzing some Iranianhigh school teachers beliefs on mathematics, mathematics learning and mathematics teaching. Journal of Environmental & Science Education 2(2), 54-59. Sigel, I. E. (1985). A conceptual analysis of beliefs. In I. E. Sigel (Ed.), Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children (pp. 345-371). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Steinbring, H. (1998). Elements of epistemological knowledge for mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematic Teacher Education, 1(2), 157-189. Tavşancıl, E. ve Aslan, A. E. (2001). Sözel, yazılı ve diğer materyaller için içerik analizi ve uygulama örnekleri. İstanbul: Epsilon Yayınları. Tekin, H. (1996). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme (10. baskı). Ankara: Yargı Yayınları. Thompson, A. (1992). Teachers beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In A. D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 127-146). New York: Macmillan. Thompson, A. G. (1984). The relationship of teachers conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 105-127. Toluk-Uçar, Z. ve Demirsoy, N. H. (2010). Eski-yeni ikilemi: Matematik öğretmenlerinin matematiksel inançları ve uygulamaları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39, 321-332. Toluk-Uçar, Z., Pişkin, M., Akkaş, E. N. ve Taşçı, D. (2010). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin matematik, matematik öğretmenleri ve matematikçiler hakkındaki inançları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35(155), 131-144. Törner, G., & Grigutsch, S. (1994). Mathematische Weltbilder bei studienanfängerneine Erhebung. Journal für Mathematik- Didaktik, 15(3/4), 211-251. Vacc, N. N., & Bright, G. W. (1999). Elementary preservice teachers changing beliefs and instructional use of children s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 89-110. Weinstein, C. S. (1989). Teacher education students preconceptions of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 53-60. Wilkins, J., & Brand, B. (2004). Change in preservice teachers beliefs: An evaluation of a mathematics methods course. School Science and Mathematics, 104(5), 226-232. Winch, R. F., & More, D. M. (1956). Quantitative analysis of qualitative data in the assessment of motivation: Reliability, congruence, and validity. American Journal of Sociology, 61(5), 445-452. Young, F. W. (1981). Quantitative analysis of qualitative data. Psychometrika, 46(4), 357-388. 809

EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES: THEORY & PRACTICE Ek 1. Ortaöğretim Matematik Öğretmenliği Lisans Programı 1. Yıl AITB191 Atatürk İlk. ve İnk. Tarihi I 2 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe ENF 100 Temel Bilgi Teknolojileri Kullanımı 3 2+1+0 Zorunlu Türkçe FIZO119 Fizik I 5 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe MATO127 Analiz I 9 4+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe MATO147 Soyut Matematik I 6 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe TDB 101 Türk Dili I 2 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe YDB 171 İngilizce I 3 3+0+0 Zorunlu İngilizce Toplamı: 30 21+3+0 AITB192 Atatürk İlk. ve İnk. Tarihi II 2 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe FIZO118 Fizik II 5 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe MATO120 Analitik Geometri 6 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe MATO128 Analiz II 9 4+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe MATO148 Soyut Matematik II 4 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe TDB 102 Türk Dili II 2 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe YDB 172 İngilizce II 2 2+0+0 Zorunlu İngilizce Toplamı: 30 22+2+0 2. Yıl ENF 245 Temel Bilgisayar - I 4 3+1+0 Zorunlu Türkçe MATO215 Lineer Cebir - I 6 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe MATO233 Analiz - III 10 4+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe MATO253 Soyut Matematik 6 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OMES213 Eğitim Bilimine Giriş 4 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe Toplamı: 30 18+3+0 ENF 246 Bilgisayar - II 4 3+1+0 Zorunlu Türkçe MATO216 Lineer Cebir - II 6 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe MATO234 Analiz IV 10 4+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe MATO260 Diferansiyel Denklemler 6 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OMES202 Gelişim Psikolojisi 4 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe Toplamı: 30 18+3+0 3. Yıl MATO313 Cebir I 8 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe MATO323 Diferansiyel Geometri 6 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe MATO331 Kompleks Analiz 6 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OFMM301 Program Geliştirme Ve Öğretim 4 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe Seçmeli-1 6 4+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECA307 Dif. Denklemler. Seçme Konu 6 4+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECA311 Olasılık 6 4+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe Toplamı: 30 19+0+0 MATO314 Cebir II 8 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe MATO336 Matematik İstatistik 7 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe MATO348 Genel Topoloji 6 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OMES302 Türk Eğitim Sis. ve Okul Yön. 3 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe Seçmeli-1 6 4+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECA302 Sayısal Analiz 6 4+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECA304 Sayılar Teorisi 6 4+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECA308 Dif. Geo. Seçme Konular 6 4+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe Toplamı: 30 18+0+0 810

DEDE, KARAKUŞ / The Effect of Teacher Training Programs on Pre-service Mathematics Teachers Beliefs towards Mathematics 4. Yıl MATO461 Kısmı Diferansiyel Denklemler 9 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OFMM403 Özel Öğretim Yöntemleri - I 8 2+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OFMM405 Matematik Felsefesi 4 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OMES401 Sınıf Yönetimi 3 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe Seçmeli-1 6 4+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECA431 Geometri 6 4+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECA433 Trigonometri 6 4+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe Toplamı: 30 14+2+0 OFMM402 Ölçme ve Değerlendirme 8 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OFMM404 Öğretim Tekno. ve Mater. Tas. 8 2+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OFMM406 Özel Öğretim Yöntemleri II 8 2+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe Seçmeli-1 6 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECA430 Matematik Tarihi 6 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECA432 Fraktalar 6 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe Toplamı: 30 10+4+0 5. Yıl OFMM501 Öğrenme Öğretme Kur. ve Yakl. 6 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OFMM503 Okul Deneyimi 6 1+4+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OFMM505 Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri 8 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe Seçmeli-1 5 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe Seçmeli-2 5 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECA531 Mat. Eğt. Bilg. Kul. 5 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECA533 Matematik Ve Hayat 5 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECA535 Matematik Eğitiminde Seç. Kon. 5 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECG507 Sağlık Ve Trafik Eğitimi 4 2+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECG509 Çevre Eğitimi 4 2+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe Toplamı: 30 13+4+0 OFMM500 Alan Eğitiminde Araştır. Projel 12 2+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OFMM504 Öğretmenlik Uygulaması 12 2+6+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OMES502 Rehberlik 6 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe Toplamı: 30 7+8+0 YIL TOPLAMI: 811

EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES: THEORY & PRACTICE Ek 2. İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenliği Lisans Programı 1. Yıl AITB191 Atatürk İlk. ve İnk. Tarihi I 2 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe ENF 147 Bilgisayar I 4 2+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMT101 Genel Matematik 16 4+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OMES103 Eğitim Bilimine Giriş 3 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe TURO109 Türkçe: Yazılı Anlatım I 2 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe YDB 117 İngilizce - I 3 3+0+0 Zorunlu İngilizce Toplamı: 30 16+4+0 AITB192 Atatürk İlk. ve İnk. Tarihi - II 2 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe ENF 136 Bilgisayar - II 4 2+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMT102 Soyut Matematik 9 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMT104 Geometri 7 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OMES104 Eğitim Psikolojisi 3 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe TURO110 Türkçe II Sözlü Anlatım 2 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe YDB 118 İngilizce - II 3 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe Toplamı: 30 18+2+0 2. Yıl IMFZ205 Fizik - I 6 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMGK207 Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri 4 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMT201 Analiz - I 8 4+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMT203 Lineer Cebir - I 6 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OMES203 Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri 3 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe Seçmeli-1 3 2+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECA201 Grafik Analizi 3 2+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe Toplamı: 30 18+2+0 IMFZ206 Fizik - II 6 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMT202 Analiz - II 8 4+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMT204 Lineer Cebir - II 6 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OMES204 Öğretim Tekno. ve Mater. Tasarı 6 2+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe Seçmeli-1 4 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECG208 Matematik ve Hayat 4 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECG210 Türkiye Coğ. ve Jeopolitiği 4 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe Toplamı: 30 16+4+0 3. Yıl IMMB307 Özel Öğretim Yöntemleri - I 5 2+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMT301 Analiz - III 5 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMT303 Analitik Geometri - I 4 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMT305 İstatistik Ve Olasılık - I 6 2+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMT309 Cebire Giriş 5 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMYK311 Bilim Tarihi 3 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe Seçmeli-1 2 2+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECM313 Matematik Öğretim Programı 2 2+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe Toplamı: 30 17+4+0 IMGK312 Topluma Hizmet Uygulamaları 6 1+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMB308 Özel Öğretim Yöntemleri - II 5 2+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMT302 Diferansiyel Denklemler 3 4+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMT304 Analitik Geometri - II 4 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMT306 İstatistik Ve Olasılık - II 6 2+2+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OMES306 Ölçme Ve Değerlendirme 3 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe 812

DEDE, KARAKUŞ / The Effect of Teacher Training Programs on Pre-service Mathematics Teachers Beliefs towards Mathematics OMES310 Türk Eğitim Tarihi 3 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe Toplamı: 30 17+6+0 4. Yıl IMGK407 Matematik Tarihi 5 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMB409 Matematik Öğr. Özel Eğitim 3 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe IMMT403 Elementer Sayı Kuramı 5 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OMES405 Okul Deneyimi 6 1+4+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OMES407 Rehberlik 3 3+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OMES411 Sınıf Yönetimi 4 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe Seçmeli-1 4 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe Seçmeli-2 4 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECA401 Matematiksel Modeller 4 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECA411 Bilgisayar Dest. Mat. Ögr. 4 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe Toplamı: 34 19+4+0 IMMT404 Matematik Felsefesi 7 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OMES404 Öğretmenlik Uygulaması 10 2+6+0 Zorunlu Türkçe OMES406 Türk Eğt. Sist. ve Okul Yönet 3 2+0+0 Zorunlu Türkçe Seçmeli-1 5 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe Seçmeli-2 5 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECG408 Çevre Eğitimi 5 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECG410 Fen Teknoloji Toplum 5 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe SECM412 Matematik Eğt. Alan Çalışması 5 3+0+0 Seçmeli Türkçe Toplamı: 30 12+6+0 YIL TOPLAMI: 64 813

EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES: THEORY & PRACTICE 814